Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33125349›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances2020

A flexible and standalone forward simulation model for laboratory X-ray diffraction contrast tomography.

H Fang, D Juul Jensen, Y Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Journal of applied crystallography · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H FangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, 2800, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8114-5276
D Juul JensenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, 2800, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5096-6602
Y ZhangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, 2800, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6901-0309
Technical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 788567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory X-ray diffraction contrast tomography (LabDCT) has recently been developed as a powerful technique for non-destructive mapping of grain microstructures in bulk materials. As the grain reconstruction relies on segmentation of diffraction spots, it is essential to understand the physics of the diffraction process and resolve all the spot features in detail. To this aim, a flexible and standalone forward simulation model has been developed to compute the diffraction projections from polycrystalline samples with any crystal structure. The accuracy of the forward simulation model is demonstrated by good agreements in grain orientations, boundary positions and shapes between a virtual input structure and that reconstructed based on the forward simulated diffraction projections of the input structure. Further experimental verification is made by comparisons of diffraction spots between simulations and experiments for a partially recrystallized Al sample, where a satisfactory agreement is found for the spot positions, sizes and intensities. Finally, applications of this model to analyze specific spot features are presented.

Indexed as

3D grain mappingdiffraction contrast tomographyforward simulationgrain reconstructionX-ray diffraction

Identifiers

PMID33125349
PMCPMC7598096
OpenAlexW3087112916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.