Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33125295›Full record

Trial reportJCO oncology practice2021

Comanagement Strategy Between Academic Institutions and Community Practices to Reduce Induction Mortality in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia.

Anand P Jillella, Martha L Arellano, Manila Gaddh, Amy A Langston, Leonard T Heffner, Elliott F Winton, Morgan L McLemore, Chao Zhang, Catherine R Caprara, Kathryn S Simon and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JCO oncology practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Acute leukemias and complicated lymphomas: pearls to optimize management when patients stay local.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Anand P JillellaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Martha L ArellanoDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Manila GaddhDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Amy A LangstonDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0003-0649-1915
Leonard T HeffnerDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Elliott F WintonDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Morgan L McLemoreDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Chao ZhangBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-9066-8658
Catherine R CapraraDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Kathryn S SimonDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Sheldon L BoldsDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Stephanie DeBraggaDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Prachi KarkhanisDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Shruthi H KrishnamurthyDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Jose TongolPhoebe Putney Cancer Center, Albany, GA.
Mohamed M El GeneidySouth Carolina Oncology Associates, Columbia, SC.
Asim PatiGibbs Cancer Center & Research Institute, Spartanburg, SC.
Jonathan M GerberDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, The Levine Cancer Institute of Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Michael R GrunwaldDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, The Levine Cancer Institute of Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Jorge CortesDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-8636-1071
Asad BasheyBlood & Marrow Transplant, Cellular Immunotherapy & Acute Leukemia Program at Northside Hospital and Blood and Marrow Transplant Group of Georgia, Atlanta, GA.
Robert K StuartHollings Cancer Institute at Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Vamsi K KotaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-5290-9289
Emory University · USAugusta University Health · USLevine Cancer Institute · USMedical University of South Carolina · USNorthside Hospital · USPhoebe Putney Memorial Hospital · USSouth Carolina Oncology Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a curable leukemia with > 90% survival in clinical trials. Population-based studies from Sweden and US SEER data have shown long-term survival rates of 62% and 65.7%, with the lower rate being from a higher percentage of early deaths.

methodsIn this prospective, multicenter trial, we developed a simplified algorithm that focused on prevention and early treatment of the three main causes of death: bleeding, differentiation syndrome, and infection. All patients with a diagnosis of APL were included. The initial 6 months were spent educating oncologists about early deaths in APL. At the time of suspicion of an APL, an expert was contacted. The algorithm was made available followed by discussion of the treatment plan. Communication between expert and treating physician was frequent in the first 2 weeks, during which time most deaths take place.

resultsBetween September 2013 and April 2016, 120 patients enrolled in the study from 32 hospitals. The median age was 52.5 years, with 39% > 60 years and 25% with an age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index > 4. Sixty-three percent of patients were managed at community centers. Two patients did not meet the criteria for analysis, and of 118 evaluable patients, 10 died, with an early mortality rate of 8.5%. With a median follow-up of 27.3 months, the overall survival was 84.5%.

conclusionInduction mortality can be decreased and population-wide survival improved in APL with the use of standardized treatment guidelines. Support from experts who have more experience with induction therapy is crucial and helps to improve the outcomes.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Promyelocytic, AcuteHemorrhageHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSwedenUniversities

Identifiers

PMID33125295
PMCPMC8202058
OpenAlexW3095153250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.