Trial reportHealth services research2020
Comparative effectiveness of external vs blended facilitation on collaborative care model implementation in slow-implementer community practices.
Trial report in Health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Student mental health outcomes of a clustered SMART for developing an adaptive implementation strategy to support school-based CBT delivery.Journal of affective disorders · 2024Trial
- Primary aim results of a clustered SMART for developing a school-level, adaptive implementation strategy to support CBT delivery at high schools in Michigan.Implementation science : IS · 2022Trial
- Comparative effectiveness of external vs blended facilitation on collaborative care model implementation in slow-implementer community practices.Health services research · 2020Trial
- Acción PrEP: A Multi-Method Pilot Design to Assess the Feasibility of Community Co-Designed Implementation Strategies to Advance PrEP Uptake Among Latines in the U.S. South.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
- Implementing the collaborative chronic care model for mental health: a nonrandomized clinical trial.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Testing theChildhood obesity (Print) · 2026Article
- Facilitators' experiences of co-designing an intrapartum care intervention in four sub-Saharan African countries: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- What scientific inferences can be made with randomized implementation rollout trials.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Achieving cardiovascular health equity in community mental health: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid Type 3 effectiveness-implementation trial.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Protocol for a Type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized trial to evaluate multi-ethnic, multilevel strategies and community engagement to eliminate hypertension disparities in Los Angeles County.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Enablers and Barriers to an Experience-Based Co-Design Process to Develop Service Improvements in Enhanced Community Care in Ireland: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Finding the right dose: a scoping review examining facilitation as an implementation strategy for evidence-based stroke care.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Standard vs. enhanced implementation strategies to increase adoption of a multidrug-resistant organism alert tool: a cluster randomized trial.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Scaling up a brief alcohol intervention to prevent HIV infection in Vietnam: a cluster randomized, implementation trial.Implementation science : IS · 2024Article
- Adaptive Designs in Implementation Science and Practice: Their Promise and the Need for Greater Understanding and Improved Communication.Annual review of public health · 2024Review
- Stakeholder and Equity Data-Driven Implementation: a Mixed Methods Pilot Feasibility Study.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024Article
- Using the Matrixed Multiple Case Study approach to identify factors affecting the uptake of IPV screening programs following the use of implementation facilitation.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- How does facilitation in healthcare work? Using mechanism mapping to illuminate the black box of a meta-implementation strategy.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Care team and practice-level implementation strategies to optimize pediatric collaborative care: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type III trial.Implementation science : IS · 2022Article
- A peek behind the curtain: exploring coaching styles within the implementation and sustainment facilitation (ISF) strategy in the substance abuse treatment to HIV care study.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the comparative effectiveness of external facilitation (EF) vs external + internal facilitation (EF/IF), on uptake of a collaborative chronic care model (CCM) in community practices that were slower to implement under low-level implementation support. STUDY
settingPrimary data were collected from 43 community practices in Michigan and Colorado at baseline and for 12 months following randomization. STUDY
designSites that failed to meet a pre-established implementation benchmark after six months of low-level implementation support were randomized to add either EF or EF/IF support for up to 12 months. Key outcomes were change in number of patients receiving the CCM and number of patients receiving a clinically significant dose of the CCM. Moderators' analyses further examined whether comparative effectiveness was dependent on prerandomization adoption, number of providers trained or practice size. Facilitation log data were used for exploratory follow-up analyses. DATA COLLECTION: Sites reported monthly on number of patients that had received the CCM. Facilitation logs were completed by study EF and site IFs and shared with the study team. PRINCIPAL
findingsN = 21 sites were randomized to EF and 22 to EF/IF. Overall, EF/IF practices saw more uptake than EF sites after 12 months (Δ
conclusionsAlthough stepping up to the more intensive EF/IF did outperform EF overall, its benefit was limited to sites that failed to deliver any CCM under the low-level strategy. Once one or more providers were delivering the CCM, additional on-site personnel did not appear to add value to the implementation effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.