Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33124997›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Exploring Eating Disorder Topics on Twitter: Machine Learning Approach.

Sicheng Zhou, Yunpeng Zhao, Jiang Bian, Ann F Haynos, Rui Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sicheng Zhou *Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9846-1475
Yunpeng ZhaoDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5771-3373
Jiang BianDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2238-5429
Ann F HaynosDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2548-1731
Rui ZhangInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8258-3585

Funding

University of Florida Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC)P30AG028740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Peihua Qiu · 2007 to 2026
$22.8M
A Translational Informatics Framework to Mine Efficacy and Safety of Dietary SupplementsR01AT009457 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI RUI ZHANG · 2017 to 2026
$4.1M
Neural Correlates of Reward and Symptom Expression in Anorexia NervosaK23MH112867 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HAYNOS, ANN FRANCES · 2017 to 2021
$878k
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009457NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028740NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH112867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEating disorders (EDs) are a group of mental illnesses that have an adverse effect on both mental and physical health. As social media platforms (eg, Twitter) have become an important data source for public health research, some studies have qualitatively explored the ways in which EDs are discussed on these platforms. Initial results suggest that such research offers a promising method for further understanding this group of diseases. Nevertheless, an efficient computational method is needed to further identify and analyze tweets relevant to EDs on a larger scale.

objectiveThis study aims to develop and validate a machine learning-based classifier to identify tweets related to EDs and to explore factors (ie, topics) related to EDs using a topic modeling method.

methodsWe collected potential ED-relevant tweets using keywords from previous studies and annotated these tweets into different groups (ie, ED relevant vs irrelevant and then promotional information vs laypeople discussion). Several supervised machine learning methods, such as convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), support vector machine, and naïve Bayes, were developed and evaluated using annotated data. We used the classifier with the best performance to identify ED-relevant tweets and applied a topic modeling method-Correlation Explanation (CorEx)-to analyze the content of the identified tweets. To validate these machine learning results, we also collected a cohort of ED-relevant tweets on the basis of manually curated rules.

resultsA total of 123,977 tweets were collected during the set period. We randomly annotated 2219 tweets for developing the machine learning classifiers. We developed a CNN-LSTM classifier to identify ED-relevant tweets published by laypeople in 2 steps: first relevant versus irrelevant (F

conclusionsA developed CNN-LSTM classifier could improve the efficiency of identifying ED-relevant tweets compared with the traditional manual-based method. The CorEx topic model was applied on the tweets identified by the machine learning-based classifier and the traditional manual approach separately. Highly overlapping topics were observed between the 2 cohorts of tweets. The produced topics were further reviewed by a domain expert. Some of the topics identified by the potential ED tweets may provide new avenues for understanding this serious set of disorders.

Indexed as

eating disorderspublic healthsocial mediatext classificationtopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID33124997
PMCPMC7665945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.