Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33124762›Full record

ArticlePediatric pulmonology2021

The evaluation of the correct use and ease-of use of the ELLIPTA DPI in children with asthma.

Philip Halverson, Joel Liem, Logan Heyes, Andy Preece, Philippe Bareille, Jamie Rees, Renu Jain, Richard H Stanford, Warren Lenney, Kathryn Collison and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03478657 (An Open-label Study to Evaluate Correct Use and Ease of Use of the ELLIPTA Dry Powder Inhaler), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 78% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03478657 phase4completednot on this map

An Open-label Study to Evaluate Correct Use and Ease of Use of the ELLIPTA Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) in Pediatric Patients Currently Receiving Inhaled Therapy for Treatment of Their Asthma

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2018 to 2018Enrolled222ConditionsAsthmaArmsPlacebo DPI, ELLIPTA DPI, Ease of use questionnaires
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Philip HalversonAllergy and Asthma Specialists, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Joel LiemJoel Liem Medicine Professional Corporation, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Logan HeyesGlaxoSmithKline plc, Stockley Park, UK.
Andy PreeceGlaxoSmithKline plc, Stockley Park, UK.
Philippe BareilleGlaxoSmithKline plc, Stevenage, UK.
Jamie ReesGlaxoSmithKline plc, Stockley Park, UK.
Renu JainGlaxoSmithKline plc, North Carolina, USA.
Richard H StanfordGlaxoSmithKline plc, North Carolina, USA.
Warren LenneyGlaxoSmithKline plc, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5033-5496
Kathryn CollisonGlaxoSmithKline plc, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6315-0450
Raj SharmaGlaxoSmithKline plc, London, UK.
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USAsthma and Allergy Specialists · USUniversity of Windsor · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAsthma studies show many children use inhalers incorrectly even after instruction. For two age groups of children with asthma, we determined the proportions who used the once-daily ELLIPTA dry-powder inhaler (DPI) correctly, and who found it easy to use.

methodsThis was a multicenter, single-arm, stratified, open-label, placebo study (NCT03478657). Children aged 5-7 and 8-11 years were trained in, and required to demonstrate, correct placebo ELLIPTA DPI use at their first clinic visit. The inhaler was used at home once daily for 28 ± 2 days. On returning to the clinic, children were randomized to an age-appropriate, ease-of-use questionnaire that had been developed and validated previously, and which rated the inhaler as "easy" or "hard" to use. Following questionnaire completion, children were then asked to demonstrate correct inhaler use. Correct use and ease-of use were assessed in each age group (co-primary endpoints) and overall (secondary endpoints).

resultsOf 222 enrolled children, 221 completed the study. Among children aged 5-7 years, 92% (n = 81/88) demonstrated correct ELLIPTA use on their first attempt, compared with 93% (n = 124/133) aged 8-11 years. Of these children, 98% (5-7 years: n = 79/81; 8-11 years: n = 121/124) rated the inhaler easy to use. Overall, 93% (n = 205/221) demonstrated correct inhaler use on their first attempt, and 98% (n = 200/205) rated it easy to use.

conclusionELLIPTA DPI was used correctly and easily by most children on their first attempt without additional training.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdultAgedAmbulatory CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolDry Powder InhalersEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPowdersSurveys and QuestionnairesPowdersdry-powder inhalerquestionnairetechnique

Identifiers

PMID33124762
PMCPMC7756266
OpenAlexW3095866229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.