Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33124618›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of neonatal screening2020

Translating Molecular Technologies into Routine Newborn Screening Practice.

Sarah M Furnier, Maureen S Durkin, Mei W Baker

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of neonatal screening, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Validation on the First-Tier Fully Automated High-ThroughputInternational journal of neonatal screening · 2025
    Article
  4. International journal of neonatal screening · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Racial inequities and rareJournal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Scaling genetic resources: New paradigms for diagnosis and treatment of rare genetic disease.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Newborn Screening by Genomic Sequencing: Opportunities and Challenges.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah M FurnierDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Maureen S DurkinDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Mei W BakerDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8707-1834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As biotechnologies advance and better treatment regimens emerge, there is a trend toward applying more advanced technologies and adding more conditions to the newborn screening (NBS) panel. In the current Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP), all conditions but one, congenital hypothyroidism, have well-defined genes and inheritance patterns, so it is beneficial to incorporate molecular testing in NBS when it is necessary and appropriate. Indeed, the applications of molecular technologies have taken NBS to previously uncharted territory. In this paper, based on our own program experience and what has been reported in the literature, we describe current practices regarding the applications of molecular technologies in routine NBS practice in the era of genomic and precision medicine.

Indexed as

cystic fibrosisdroplet digital polymerase chain reactionnewborn screeningnext generation sequencingreal-time polymerase chain reactionsevere combined immunodeficiencyspinal muscular atrophyTetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system–polymerase chain reaction

Identifiers

PMID33124618
PMCPMC7712315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.