Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33124204›Full record

ArticleActa ophthalmologica2021

Comprehensive analysis of genetic and clinical characteristics of 30 patients with X-linked juvenile retinoschisis in China.

Feng-Juan Gao, Jian-Hong Dong, Dan-Dan Wang, Fang Chen, Fang-Yuan Hu, Qing Chang, Ping Xu, Wei Liu, Jian-Kang Li, Ying Huang and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Whole-exome sequencing identifies anExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Feng-Juan GaoEye Institute, Eye and ENT Hospital, College of Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2799-3554
Jian-Hong DongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Central Hospital of Xuhui District, Shanghai, China.
Dan-Dan WangEye Institute, Eye and ENT Hospital, College of Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6922-6644
Fang ChenBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Fang-Yuan HuEye Institute, Eye and ENT Hospital, College of Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qing ChangEye Institute, Eye and ENT Hospital, College of Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ping XuEye Institute, Eye and ENT Hospital, College of Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wei LiuEye Institute, Eye and ENT Hospital, College of Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jian-Kang LiBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Ying HuangEye Institute, Eye and ENT Hospital, College of Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ji-Hong WuEye Institute, Eye and ENT Hospital, College of Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3892-5757
Ge-Zhi XuEye Institute, Eye and ENT Hospital, College of Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNBGI Group (China) · CNEye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University · CNShanghai Xuhui Central Hospital · CN

Funding

Shanghai clinical medical center of ocular disease 2017ZZ01020Shanghai municipal science and technology major projects 2018SHZDZX05the National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC81770925the National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC81790641the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences 2018PT32019Xuhui district health and family planning commission key disease joint project XHLHGG201807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provides the clinical and genetic characteristics of a series of Chinese patients with X-linked juvenile retinoschisis (XLRS) through multimodal imaging and next-generation sequencing.

methodsThirty patients (60 eyes) from 29 unrelated families of Chinese origin with XLRS were screened using multigene panel testing, and underwent a complete clinical evaluation. All variants identified in this study and reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database were analysed.

resultsTwenty-five distinct variants in the retinoschisin gene were identified, of which eight were novel, and one was de novo. Missense mutations were the most prevalent type, and mutation hot spot was localized in the discoidin domain. The mean Snellen best-corrected visual acuity was 0.28 ± 0.17. Of all eyes presenting with schisis, 92.86% had lamellar schisis and 62.5% had peripheral schisis. Schisis changes mostly involved inner and outer nuclear layers. X-linked juvenile retinoschisis (XLRS) patients had a high incidence of complications, and peripheral schisis was a risk factor for it. No obvious genotype-phenotype association was observed.

conclusionThis study provides comprehensive analyses of the genetic and clinical characteristics of XLRS in a cohort of Chinese patients. The fourth de novo mutation in RS1 was identified. And we show that XLRS has a wide spectrum of clinical characteristics; hence, molecular diagnosis is crucial for its diagnosis, differential diagnosis and genetic counselling. Peripheral schisis is a risk factor for the high incidence of complications, and no clear genotype-phenotype correlations were found.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissenseVisual AcuityAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolChinaDNADNA Mutational AnalysisElectroretinographyFemaleGenetic Association StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedDNAChinese populationclinical diagnosismolecular geneticsoptical coherence tomographyRS1X-linked retinoschisis

Identifiers

PMID33124204
PMCPMC8359357
OpenAlexW3096091064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.