Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33124196›Full record

ReviewPharmacology research & perspectives2020

Climate change in healthcare: Exploring the potential role of inhaler prescribing.

Joachim Starup-Hansen, Henry Dunne, Jonathan Sadler, Anna Jones, Michael Okorie

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Contributions of Medical Greenhouse Gases to Climate Change and Their Possible Alternatives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  11. Climate-conscious inhaler prescribing for family physicians.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Review
  12. The Impact of Climate Change on Respiratory Care: A Scoping Review.The journal of climate change and health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Environmental impact of inhaler devices on respiratory care: a narrative review.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joachim Starup-HansenBrighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Henry DunneBrighton & Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK.
Jonathan SadlerBrighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Anna JonesBrighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Michael OkorieBrighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1960-8860
Brighton and Sussex Medical School · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change has been described as the biggest global health threat of the 21st century. As a result, governments around the world are committing to legislative change in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs). The healthcare sector makes a significant contribution to GHGEs and in line with national legislation in the UK, the NHS has recently committed to achieving net zero emissions by 2050. The management of asthma and COPD largely depends on the prescribing of medications that are delivered through inhalers. In the UK, the use of pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), which rely on hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) propellants accounts for 3.5% of the NHS's total carbon footprint. In contrast, dry powder inhalers (DPIs) have a much lower carbon footprint due to the absence of a HFC propellant. Here we review evidence of the impact of inhaler choices across four domains: environmental impact, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and patient preferences. We find that as well as a lower global-warming potential, DPIs have additional benefits over pMDIs in other domains and should be considered first line where clinically appropriate.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeDrug PrescriptionsAdministration, InhalationAsthmaDelivery of Health CareDry Powder InhalersEnvironmental ExposureHumansMetered Dose InhalersPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructiveclimate changeinhalerssustainable prescribing

Identifiers

PMID33124196
PMCPMC7596665
OpenAlexW3095804563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.