Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33124185›Full record

ArticlePsychology and psychotherapy2021

Attachment as a framework to facilitate empowerment for people with severe mental illness.

Cathelijn D Tjaden, Cornelis L Mulder, Philippe A E G Delespaul, Arnoud R Arntz, Hans Kroon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology and psychotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cathelijn D TjadenDepartment of Reintegration and Community Care, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9326-5600
Cornelis L MulderDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1038-9211
Philippe A E G DelespaulSchool of Mental Health and NeuroSciences, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7420-0898
Arnoud R ArntzDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7992-2272
Hans KroonDepartment of Reintegration and Community Care, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2259-1628
Tilburg University · NLErasmus MC · NLMaastricht University · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRecovery and empowerment have evolved into key objectives in the treatment and care of people with severe mental illness (SMI), and interest has grown in the role of social relationships in recovery. This study is the first to explore whether attachment styles are related to levels of empowerment, and secondly, whether attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance are associated with lower empowerment levels, independently of quality and frequency of social contact.

designWe used a cross-sectional design.

methodsIn a sample of 157 participants with SMI in outpatient care, associations between attachment (Revised Adult Attachment Scale), self-reported social functioning, and empowerment (Netherlands Empowerment List) were assessed.

resultsAttachment anxiety and attachment avoidance were both associated with lower levels of empowerment. A stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the prediction of empowerment was significantly improved by adding attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance to quality and frequency of social contact. Attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, and quality of social contact were significant predictors; frequency of social contact was not.

conclusionsAlthough our design does not allow causal conclusions, our results highlight the importance of interpersonal processes and behaviours as routes to improving empowerment for people with SMI. A promising approach might thus consist of securing attachment bonds with significant others so that the self and the other are perceived as reliable resources. Our findings also feature the importance of reciprocity and equality in social relationships. Taken together, our study emphasizes the value of social, contextualized interventions in recovery work for people with SMI. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Working towards attachment safety in interpersonal relations may be important in recovery-oriented treatment and care for people with severe mental illness (SMI). Helping people with SMI to recognize and change how they tend to relate themselves to others may promote engagement and effectiveness of recovery-oriented treatment and care. Reciprocity and equality in social relationships as vital complements to the more one-sided nature of 'standing alongside' and offering support may be important requisites for empowerment.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersAdultAnxietyAnxiety DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInterpersonal Relationsattachmentempowermentinterpersonal relationshipsrecoverysevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID33124185
PMCPMC8451854
OpenAlexW3096352482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.