Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33124007›Full record

ReviewDrug research2021

Remdesivir: Critical Clinical Appraisal for COVID 19 Treatment.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Lessons from SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 Infections: What We Know So Far.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022
    Review
  4. Remdesivir: Quo vadis?Biochemical pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  5. NaFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saptarshi ChatterjeeAssistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Adamas University, Kolkata.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remdesivir is presently been considered as 'molecule of hope' to curb the menace of COVID19. Non-availability of any USFDA approved drug has led to several attempt of drug-repurposing and development of new therapeutic molecules. However, Remdesivir has been found to be effective against a broad range of virus including SARS, MERS and COVID 19 through in-vitro studies. Several clinical research attempt are presently being conducted showing promising result yet not conclusive. This review summarized all such clinical trials to critically appraise the usage of Remdesivir against COVID 19 along with the publications related to the results of the clinical studies. The present regulatory aspect i. e. Emergency Use Authorization (EYA) and information of molecule and plausible mechanism is also dealt.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsClinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19Drug ApprovalHumansRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsremdesivirRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID33124007
PMCPMC8043717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.