Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123963›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2021

The Cerebellum and Implicit Sequencing: Evidence from Cerebellar Ataxia.

Owen P Morgan, Mitchell B Slapik, Katherine G Iannuzzelli, Stephen M LaConte, Jonathan M Lisinski, Peg C Nopoulos, Ashley M Cochran, Sharif I Kronemer, Liana S Rosenthal, Cherie L Marvel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impulsivity in cerebellar ataxia: an online, multidimensional assessment.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The underpinnings of cerebellar ataxias.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Owen P MorganDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mitchell B SlapikDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Katherine G IannuzzelliDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Stephen M LaConteFralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Jonathan M LisinskiFralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Peg C NopoulosDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Ashley M CochranDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Sharif I KronemerInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program and the Department of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Liana S RosenthalDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cherie L MarvelDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. cmarvel1@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2818-8303
Johns Hopkins University · USBiomedical Research Institute · USUniversity of Iowa · USYale University · US

Funding

Gordon and Marilyn Macklin Foundation noneMargaret Q. Landenberger Foundation None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellum recognizes sequences from prior experiences and uses this information to generate internal models that predict future outcomes in a feedforward manner [Front Hum Neurosci 8: 475, 2014; Cortex 47: 137-44, 2011; Cerebellum 7: 611-5, 2008; J Neurosci 26: 9107-16, 2006]. This process has been well documented in the motor domain, but the cerebellum's role in cognitive sequencing, within the context of implicit versus explicit processes, is not well characterized. In this study, we tested individuals with cerebellar ataxia and healthy controls to clarify the role of the cerebellum sequencing using variations on implicit versus explicit and motor versus cognitive demands across five experiments. Converging results across these studies suggest that cerebellar feedforward mechanisms may be necessary for sequencing in the implicit domain only. In the ataxia group, rhythmic tapping, rate of motor learning, and implicit sequence learning were impaired. However, for cognitive sequencing that could be accomplished using explicit strategies, the cerebellar group performed normally, as though they shifted to extra-cerebellar mechanisms to compensate. For example, when cognitive and motor functions relied on cerebellar function simultaneously, the ataxia group's motor function was unaffected, in contrast to that of controls whose motor performance declined as a function of cognitive load. These findings indicated that the cerebellum is not critical for all forms of sequencing per se. Instead, it plays a fundamental role for sequencing within the implicit domain, whether functions are motor or cognitive. Moreover, individuals with cerebellar ataxia are generally able to compensate for cognitive sequencing when explicit strategies are available in order to preserve resources for motor function.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCerebellar AtaxiaCerebellumFemaleHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedAtaxiaCerebellumExplicitImplicitMotorSequencing

Identifiers

PMID33123963
OpenAlexW3095656272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.