Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123951›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2021

Effects of Volume Replacement for Urinary Losses from Mannitol Diuresis on Brain Water in Normal Rats.

Allan Gottschalk, Thomas J K Toung

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Allan GottschalkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Phipps Building, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University, 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. agottschalk@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0471-728X
Thomas J K ToungDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Phipps Building, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University, 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveIt is frequently recommended that urine output following perioperative mannitol administration be replaced 1:1 with an isotonic crystalloid solution. It is possible that this strategy could increase brain water by reducing the serum osmolality achieved with prior mannitol administration. Therefore, brain water content of rats treated with mannitol alone or mannitol plus normal saline (NS) was studied over a range of urinary replacement ratios.

methodsMale Wister rats received mannitol 3.2 gm/100 gm infused over 45 min followed by hourly determinations of urine output (UO). Control animals received no additional therapy, whereas animals undergoing intervention received hourly replacement of their urinary losses with 0.9% NS in decreasing NS:UO ratios (1:1, 1:2, 1:3). Three hours after completion of the mannitol infusion, a final tally of UO was made. At that time in all animals, blood was obtained for determination of hemoglobin and electrolyte concentrations and plasma osmolality. Following that, the animals were sacrificed to determine brain water content. Additional groups underwent the same protocol but for 5 h with 1:1 urinary replacement, or received a volume of NS equal to that of the mannitol administered to all other control and intervention animals.

results1:1 replacement of urinary loss with NS following mannitol administration was associated with brain water content indistinguishable from control animals receiving only a volume of NS equal to that of the mannitol administered to all other groups. Regression analysis demonstrated a decrease in the final brain water content of 0.67% (CI95 0.43-0.92, p < 0.001) per replacement level as NS:UO replacement ratios were decreased from 1:1 to 1:2 and, finally to 1:3. At the final NS:UO replacement ratio of 1:3, brain water content was indistinguishable from the control group receiving mannitol without NS replacement (p = 0.48) For 1:1 replacement following mannitol, brain water did not differ between experiments of 3 or 5 h duration (p = 0.52).

conclusionsIn rats, NS replacement of UO 1:1 following mannitol administration leads to brain water content no different than if NS had been given in place of mannitol. Only when the NS:UO replacement ratio was 1:3, brain water was similar to that of control animals receiving mannitol alone. The recommendation to replace UO 1:1 with an equal volume of isotonic crystalloid following perioperative mannitol administration must recognize how this strategy could elevate brain water content compared to less vigorous replacement of UO.

Indexed as

Brain EdemaMannitolAnimalsBrainDiuresisMaleRatsRats, WistarWaterMannitolWaterBrain waterCerebral edemaIntracranial pressureMannitolNormal salineOsmotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33123951
OpenAlexW3097877258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.