ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
Risk of serious infection, malignancy, or death in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with a combination of abatacept and tacrolimus: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-Analysis of the Incidence and Influencing Factors of Malignant Tumors in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026Pooled it
- Immunosuppressants/Immunomodulators and Malignancy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Abatacept is Efficacious in the Treatment of Older Patients with csDMARD-Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.Rheumatology and therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate whether combinatorial use of abatacept (ABT) and tacrolimus (Tac) increases the risk of adverse events compared to their individual use in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of RA patients using the Japanese multicenter database and analyzed the data of RA patients registered from April 2010 to March 2019 by comparing three treatment groups who received Tac, ABT, or a combination of both. We included patients who had initiated treatment with ABT or Tac and excluded patients who used tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, and Jak inhibitors in the first year of our study. The primary outcome was the occurrence of adverse events such as infections that required hospitalization, newly diagnosed malignancy, or death from any cause after initiation of ABT or Tac. Of the 27,032 RA patients in the registry, 2009 patients were included. The Tac, ABT, and combination groups consisted of 1328, 563, and 118 patients, respectively. Primary outcome occurred in 149 (13.4%), 62 (13.5%), and 14 (13.9%) patients of the Tac, ABT, and combination groups, respectively. The incidence of adverse events between groups was not significantly different (p = 0.638). A Cox regression analysis which was adjusted for potential confounders such as age, disease activity, and concomitant use of prednisolone revealed no significant differences between groups. The combinatorial use of ABT and Tac, or ABT alone does not increase the risk of adverse events when compared to the use of Tac alone in RA patients in Japan. Key Points • This study included Japanese rheumatoid arthritis data and found that there was no significant risk when patients were treated with a combination of Tac and ABT or each drug alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.