ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2021
Complications of Biliary Drainage in Patients with Malignant Biliary Obstruction.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The consequences of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with tumoral obstructive jaundice: A retrospective study and review of literature.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) as Predictors of Short-Term Survival in Patients with Advanced Malignant Biliary Obstruction Treated with Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Malignant biliary obstruction due to metastatic non-hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography drainage for palliation of malignant hilar biliary obstruction - stent-in-stent or side-by-side? A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of hepatology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBiliary tract obstruction in cancer patients is usually associated with a poor prognosis. The obstruction may cause distressing symptoms, such as pruritus. As this situation occurs mostly in advanced cancer, the primary objective of the treatment is in many cases symptom control and not prolonging life. However, some patients can be candidates for chemotherapy. To see the outcomes of stenting insertion in patients of our oncology center.
methodsA retrospective study of patients who have undergone this procedure between 1 October 2011 and 31 December 2018 was carried out.
resultsInsertion of a biliary stent was performed in 171 patients. The most common diagnoses were gastric and colorectal cancers, each with 42 (24%), followed by pancreatic (34 (20%)) and biliary tract cancer (25 (14%)). Most stents (155 (91%)) were placed percutaneously. Complications were seen in 91 (53%) patients and the most common was cholangitis in 48 (53%) patients, and the median survival was 75.5 days (3-1246). A total of 168 (98%) patients were referred to palliative care. In a multivariable analysis, the ECOG performance status was associated with survival, with the ECOG 0, 1, and 2 associated with better survival and peritoneal metastases associated with lower survival.
conclusionsFor many patients with advanced cancers, it may not be clear if the benefits of palliative biliary stents outweigh the risks. Therefore, the problem should be discussed with the patients and their families, making clear the goals of care and the potential benefits and risks that can be expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.