Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123832›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2021

Towards systematic nomenclature for cell-free DNA.

Abel J Bronkhorst, Vida Ungerer, Frank Diehl, Philippe Anker, Yuval Dor, Michael Fleischhacker, Peter B Gahan, Lisa Hui, Stefan Holdenrieder, Alain R Thierry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abel J BronkhorstInstitute for Laboratory Medicine, German Heart Centre, Technical University Munich, Lazarettstraße 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Vida UngererInstitute for Laboratory Medicine, German Heart Centre, Technical University Munich, Lazarettstraße 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Frank DiehlThrive Earlier Detection Corp., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Philippe AnkerIRCM, Institute of Research in Oncology of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Yuval DorDepartment of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.
Michael FleischhackerDRK Kliniken Berlin Mitte, Klinik für Innere Medizin, Pneumologie und Schlafmedizin, Drontheimer Str. 39-40, 13359, Berlin, Germany.
Peter B GahanFondazione "Enrico Puccinelli" Onlus, 06126, Perugia, Italy.
Lisa HuiReproductive Epidemiology Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Stefan HoldenriederInstitute for Laboratory Medicine, German Heart Centre, Technical University Munich, Lazarettstraße 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Alain R ThierryIRCM, Institute of Research in Oncology of Montpellier, Montpellier, France. alain.thierry@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4632-5404

Funding

Montpellier SIRIC n°2015-045 SIRICEOTPR150773 2015-045 SIRICEOTPR150773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become widely recognized as a promising candidate biomarker for minimally invasive characterization of various genomic disorders and other clinical scenarios. However, among the obstacles that currently challenge the general progression of the research field, there remains an unmet need for unambiguous universal cfDNA nomenclature. To address this shortcoming, we classify in this report the different types of cfDNA molecules that occur in the human body based on its origin, genetic traits, and locality. We proceed by assigning existing terms to each of these cfDNA subtypes, while proposing new terms and abbreviations where clarity is lacking and more precise stratification would be beneficial. We then suggest the proper usage of these terms within different contexts and scenarios, focusing mainly on the nomenclature as it relates to the domains of oncology, prenatal testing, and post-transplant surgery surveillance. We hope that these recommendations will serve as useful considerations towards the establishment of universal cfDNA nomenclature in the future. In addition, it is conceivable that many of these recommendations can be transposed to cell-free RNA nomenclature by simply exchanging "DNA" with "RNA" in each acronym/abbreviation. Similarly, when describing DNA and RNA collectively, the suffix can be replaced with "NAs" to indicate nucleic acids.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsTerminology as TopicAnimalsHumansCell-Free Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID33123832
PMCPMC7981329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.