Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123820›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2021

Sequential reversal learning: a new touchscreen schedule for assessing cognitive flexibility in mice.

Anna U Odland, Rune Sandahl, Jesper T Andreasen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Striatal Serotonin Release Signals Reward Value.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna U OdlandDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rune SandahlDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper T AndreasenDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. jta@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-4990
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Lundbeckfonden R263-20173000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe widespread deficits in cognitive flexibility observed across psychiatric disorders call for improved rodent tests to understand the biology of cognitive flexibility and development of better psychotherapeutics. Current reversal learning paradigms have a forced-choice setup that challenges the interpretation of results.

objectivesWe aimed at developing a free-choice reversal learning test, where images are presented sequentially and animals are free to move, to enable investigation of the cognitive sub-processes that occur during reversal.

methodsBehavior in female C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice was characterized using chronic fluoxetine as a reference compound. Additional tests were included to support the interpretation of results and exclude confounding pharmacological effects. Behaviors in vehicle-treated mice were furthermore analyzed for relatedness to deepen the understanding of parameters measured.

resultsWe found that exploitation of the previously rewarded image was independent of exploration and acquisition of the new reward contingency and could be differentially modulated by fluoxetine, supporting recent theories that these processes are not mutually exclusive. Specifically, fluoxetine reduced mistake rate, premature and perseverative responses, and promoted conservative strategies during reversal without affecting hit rate. These effects appeared to be most prominent during the late stage of reversal learning, where accuracy was above chance level. Analysis of behaviors in vehicle-treated mice suggested that exploitation was related to an impulsive-like deficit in response inhibition, while exploration was more related to motivation.

conclusionsThis new schedule was feasible, easy to implement, and can provide a deeper understanding of the cognitive sub-processes during reversal.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCognitionConditioning, OperantDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleFluoxetineMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReversal LearningTime FactorsFluoxetineCognitive flexibilityExploitationExplorationExtinctionGo/no-goMouse behaviorReversal learningSequentialSerotoninTouchscreen

Identifiers

PMID33123820
OpenAlexW3097845947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.