Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123814›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2020

Day-to-day variability of [

Judith Olde Heuvel, Berlinda J de Wit-van der Veen, Maarten L Donswijk, Cornelis H Slump, Marcel P M Stokkel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predicting [EJNMMI physics · 2023
    Article
  2. Impact of [Cancers · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cancers · 2022
    Article
  6. Tumor Sink Effect inJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Intraindividual comparison of [EJNMMI research · 2021
    Article
  8. Is SUV Corrected for Lean Body Mass Superior to SUV of Body Weight inMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Judith Olde HeuvelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3219-8608
Berlinda J de Wit-van der VeenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. l.vd.veen@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7860-2904
Maarten L DonswijkDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2028-9713
Cornelis H SlumpTechnical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6544-4567
Marcel P M StokkelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8131-5690
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 15175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProstate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) agents, such as [

methodsTwenty-four primary PCa patients were prospectively included, who already were scheduled for [

resultsWithin-subject coefficient of variation of [

conclusionResults of test-retest [

Indexed as

Primary prostate cancerPSMA PET/CTRepeatabilityTest–retestTracer uptake

Identifiers

PMID33123814
PMCPMC7596127
OpenAlexW3097946331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.