ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Assessment of BOLD response in the fetal lung.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiological assessment of the fetal body using MRI: current uses and potential directions.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Fetal lung MRI and features predicting post-natal outcome: a scoping review of the current literature.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Mediastinal shift angle (MSA) measurement with MRI: a simple and effective tool for prenatal risk stratification in fetuses with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.European radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAssessment of lung development and maturity is of utmost importance in prenatal counseling. Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) effect MRI was developed for functional evaluations of organs. To date, no data are available in fetal lungs and nothing is known about the existence of a BOLD effect in the lungs. The aim of our study was to evaluate if a BOLD response could be detected in fetal lungs. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom January 2014 to December 2016, 38 healthy pregnant women were prospectively enrolled. After a routine scan on a 1.5-T MRI device (normoxic period), maternal hyperoxia was induced for 5 min before the BOLD sequence (hyperoxic period). R2* was evaluated by fitting average intensity of the signal, both for normoxic (norm) and hyperoxic (hyper) periods.
resultsA significant BOLD response was observed after maternal hyperoxia in the lungs with a mean R2* decrease of 12.1 ± 2.5% (p < 0.001), in line with the placenta response with a mean R2* decrease of 19.2 ± 5.9% (p < 0.0001), confirming appropriate oxygen uptake. Conversely, no significant BOLD effect was observed for the brain nor the liver with a mean ∆R2* of 3.6 ± 3.1% (p = 0.64) and 2.8 ± 3.7% (p = 0.23).
conclusionThis study shows for the first time in human that a BOLD response can be observed in the normal fetal lung despite its prenatal "non-functional status." If confirmed in congenital lung and chest malformations, this property could be used in addition to the lung volume for a better prediction of postnatal respiratory status. KEY POINTS: • Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) effect MRI was developed for functional evaluations of organs and could have interesting implications for the fetal organs. • Assessment of lung development is of utmost importance in prenatal counseling, but to date no data are available in fetal lungs. • BOLD response can be observed in the normal fetal lung opening the way to studies on fetus with pathological lungs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.