ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2021
Embryology of the urogenital tract; a practical overview for urogynecologic surgeons.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Pregnancy complicated by patent urachus: A case report].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025Article
- Ectopic Kidney, a Challenging First Trimester Diagnosis-Case Report and Literature Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Magnetic resonance urography of congenital abnormalities - what the radiologist needs to know.Pediatric radiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisUrinary tract anomalies are one of the most common birth defects. Nevertheless, they prove challenging to diagnose as a result of variable presenting symptoms. We aimed to perform a review of urogenital tract development, highlight common congenital upper urinary tract anomalies encountered by urogynecologists and tools to facilitate diagnosis.
methodsMultiple searches were performed utilizing resources such as PubMed and the TriHealth library database to access publications related to embryology of the urinary tract and urinary tract anomalies. Each citation was reviewed.
resultsCongenital urinary tract anomalies account for up to 20% of all birth defects and occur more often in females. The true incidence of these malformations is unknown as some can remain clinically insignificant throughout life. In addition, patients may present with non-specific complaints such as urinary tract infections, nephrolithiasis or urinary incontinence. Therefore, unsuspected anomalies pose a risk of delayed diagnosis and potential injury during urogynecologic surgery. Imaging modalities such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging are the most common diagnostic tests. Management and treatment options range from observation to surgical resection with the goal of optimizing long-term functionality and prevention of chronic sequelae.
conclusionPatients with urinary tract anomalies can present with vague complaints often encountered by urogynecologists. It is crucial to understand the embryologic development of urinary tract anomalies to help facilitate diagnosis and guide care within the office and operating room setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.