Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123699›Full record

ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2020

The Senhance ® assisted laparoscopy in urogynaecology: case report of sacral colpopexy with subtotal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for pelvic organ prolapse

G Panico, G Campagna, L Vacca, D Caramazza, S Pizzacalla, V Rumolo, G Scambia, A Ercoli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Early Experience with the Senhance Surgical System in Bariatric Surgery.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G PanicoFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Uroginecologia e Chirurgia Ricostruttiva del Pavimento Pelvico, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Roma, Italia,00168.
G CampagnaFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Uroginecologia e Chirurgia Ricostruttiva del Pavimento Pelvico, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Roma, Italia,00168.
L VaccaFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Uroginecologia e Chirurgia Ricostruttiva del Pavimento Pelvico, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Roma, Italia,00168.
D CaramazzaFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC Uroginecologia e Chirurgia Ricostruttiva del Pavimento Pelvico, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Roma, Italia,00168.
S PizzacallaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Ginecologia ed Ostetricia, Roma, Italia, 00168; 4 PID Ginecologia Oncologica e Chirurgia Ginecologica Miniinvasiva, Università degli studi di Messina, Policlinico G.Martino, Messina, Italia ,98124.
V RumoloFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Roma, Italia, 00168.
G ScambiaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Ginecologia ed Ostetricia, Roma, Italia, 00168; 4 PID Ginecologia Oncologica e Chirurgia Ginecologica Miniinvasiva, Università degli studi di Messina, Policlinico G.Martino, Messina, Italia ,98124.
A ErcoliDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of East Piedmont "A. Avogadro", Novara, Italy.
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this case report was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of nerve-sparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (SCP) performed with a minimally invasive approach by using 2.9-mm Senhance ® surgical robotic system (Senhance ® , TRANSENTERIX Inc., USA). A 60-year-old Caucasian woman with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse-Q (POP-Q) Aa: 2, Ba: 3, C: +4, Bp:2, Ap: 2, TVL:10 underwent subtotal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, with nerve-sparing SCP performed using the Senhance surgical robotic system.. The urogynaecological assessment on the day of discharge and at the 3 month follow-up showed surgical anatomic success (<2 POP-Q stage). The patient was fully satisfied with the cosmetic result. This is the first case of SCP performed with this innovative system. SCP using "Senhance ®" is a feasible and effective approach with good results in terms of operative time, cosmesis, postoperative pain and length of hospitalisation.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPelvic organ prolapseRobotic surgerySacrocolpopexy

Identifiers

PMID33123699
PMCPMC7580262
OpenAlexW4293150039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.