Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123696›Full record

ReviewFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2020

Bowel anastomosis leakage following endometriosis surgery: an evidence based analysis of risk factors and prevention techniques.

A Vigueras Smith, R Sumak, R Cabrera, W Kondo, H Ferreira

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A Vigueras SmithDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit of Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto. Portugal.
R SumakDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit of Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto. Portugal.
R CabreraDepartment of Gynaecology and Minimally Invasive Unit, Vita Batel Hospital. Curitiba. Brazil.
W KondoDepartment of Gynaecology and Minimally Invasive Unit, Vita Batel Hospital. Curitiba. Brazil.
H FerreiraDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit of Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto. Portugal.
Centro Hospitalar do Porto · PTHospital IPO · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep endometriosis most commonly involves the rectosigmoid junction and its management often requires a colorectal resection. Anastomotic leakage is a severe complication after resection and affects 1-6% of the cases.

objectiveTo evaluate the risk factors related to anastomotic leakage following endometriosis sur-gery, its prevention techniques and the role of protective stomas.

methodsA comprehensive literature review was carried out for English-language publications in Pubmed and Google Scholar. We included all studies including the following MeSH terms and key words: Anastomotic leakage AND bowel surgery OR Endometriosis OR Colorectal surgery OR Bowel endometriosis. Two authors independently made a selection and analysed relevant abstracts according to the aim of this review.

resultsRisk factors and preventive measures were categorised considering the patient condition, the intra- operative setting and the surgical procedure itself. Level I and II recommendations include modifiable risk factors such as the use of stapled or handsewn anastomosis; intra-operative air leak test to check the integrity of the anastomosis; systematic use of pelvic and trans-anal drainage; application of protective or ghost ileostomy in low rectal resections; vaginal closure before the bowel resection; use of oral antibiotics the day before surgery and performing partial mesorectal resection near the bowel wall. Diverting stomas may decrease the morbidity and the clinical consequences of leakage over 65% of low rectal resections but may cause significant adverse effects.

conclusionEvidence-based protective actions are crucial to reduce clinical consequences of anastomotic leakage and to minimise the use of protective stomas in endometriosis surgery.

Indexed as

Anastomotic leakagebowel endometriosiscolorectal anastomosisendometriosis

Identifiers

PMID33123696
PMCPMC7580259
OpenAlexW3096912084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.