ArticleJB & JS open access
Wear Rates of XLPE Nearly 50% Lower Than Previously Thought After Adjusting for Initial Creep: An RCT Comparing 4 Bearing Combinations.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Risk factors for liner wear and head migration in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Oxidised zirconium heads show a lower linear wear rate than 28-mm metal heads against XLPE: a retrospective analysis.Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy · 2026Article
- In vivo creep and wear performance of vitamin-E-diffused highly crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- [Tribology in hip arthroplasty : Benefits of different materials].Der Orthopade · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ideal bearing combination for total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains debatable. Highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) is widely used, but long-term wear rates are not fully known, nor is how much the initial "creep," if any, affects overall wear. Additionally, the use of oxidized zirconium (OxZir) is purported to lower polyethylene wear rates, but this has not been proven. We present the 10-year data of a cohort of patients who underwent THA. Patients were prospectively randomized to 1 of 4 bearing combinations: a conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) or XLPE acetabular liner coupled with either a cobalt-chromium (CoCr) or OxZir femoral head. The aims of the study were to (1) assess the extent to which creep affected overall wear rates and (2) assess wear rates between OxZir and CoCr with polyethylene.
methodsA total of 92 hips (92 patients) between the ages of 22 and 65 years (mean, 52.2 ± 9.3 years) were randomized to 4 groups. At 10 years, 70 (76%) of the hips were available for analysis; patients who had undergone revision, had died, or were lost to follow-up were excluded from final analysis. Radiographic analysis was performed using a validated digital assessment program to determine linear, volumetric, and directional wear of the polyethylene for all 4 bearing couples. Radiographic assessments were performed immediately postoperatively, at 6 and 12 weeks, and then annually for a minimum of 10 years.
resultsXLPE had significantly lower wear rates than UHMWPE. Once creep was eliminated, annual and overall wear rates were nearly 50% lower than have been previously reported. This was proportionally more important in the XLPE group than in the UHMWPE group. There was a nonsignificant trend toward a lower wear rate with OxZir heads.
conclusionsCreep plays a notably more important role than first thought. Once creep was eliminated, the overall wear rate was even lower than previously assumed. This has important implications for the overall survivorship of hip arthroplasty implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.