Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123529›Full record

ArticleOcular oncology and pathology2020

Monte Carlo Computation of Dose-Volume Histograms in Structures at Risk of an Eye Irradiated with Heterogeneous Ruthenium-106 Plaques.

Francisco J Zaragoza, Marion Eichmann, Dirk Flühs, Beate Timmermann, Lorenzo Brualla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ocular oncology and pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francisco J ZaragozaFaculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Marion EichmannFakultät Physik, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Dirk FlühsNCTeam, Strahlenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
Beate TimmermannWest German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany.
Lorenzo BruallaWest German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsThe aim of this work is to compare Monte Carlo simulated absorbed dose distributions obtained from

methodsThe generic CCA and CCB, with a homogeneous emitter map, and the specific CCA1364 and CCB1256

resultsFor the cornea, the CCA with the equatorial placement yields the lowest absorbed dose rate while for the CCA1364 in the same placement the absorbed dose rate is 33% higher. The CCB1256 with the hot spot oriented towards the cornea yields the maximum dose rate per unit of activity while it is 44% lower for the CCB.

conclusionsDose calculations based on a homogeneous distribution of the emitter substance yield the lowest absorbed dose in the analyzed structures for all plaque placements. Treatment planning based on such calculations may result in an overdose of the structures at risk.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyDose-volume histogramDosimetryEye plaquesMonte CarloPENELOPERutheniumTreatment planningβ-Emitter

Identifiers

PMID33123529
PMCPMC7574611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.