Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123501›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2020

Validation of the GALAD Model and Establishment of GAAP Model for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chinese Patients.

Miaoxia Liu, Ruihong Wu, Xu Liu, Hongqin Xu, Xiumei Chi, Xiaomei Wang, Mengru Zhan, Bao Wang, Fei Peng, Xiuzhu Gao and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Early screening for liver cancer must be performed.World journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Alpha-fetoprotein: Past, present, and future.Hepatology communications · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B (version 2022).Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Miaoxia Liu *Department of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, People's Republic of China.
Ruihong Wu *Department of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7585-0059
Xu LiuDepartment of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, People's Republic of China.
Hongqin XuDepartment of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, People's Republic of China.
Xiumei ChiDepartment of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6291-8496
Xiaomei WangDepartment of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, People's Republic of China.
Mengru ZhanDepartment of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2419-6859
Bao WangDepartment of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, People's Republic of China.
Fei PengDepartment of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5446-9854
Xiuzhu GaoDepartment of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6310-1456
Ying ShiDepartment of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyu WenDepartment of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, People's Republic of China.
Yali JiHepatology Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, People's Republic of China.
Qinglong JinDepartment of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, People's Republic of China.
Junqi NiuDepartment of Hepatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGALAD is a statistical model for estimating the likelihood of having hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on gender, age, AFP, AFP-L3, and PIVKA-II. We aimed to assess its performance and build new models in China, where hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the leading etiology of HCC. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe built the GALAD-C model with the same five variables in GALAD, and the GAAP model with gender, age, AFP, and PIVKA-II, using logistic regression based on 242 patients with HCC and 283 patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). We also collected 50 patients with other malignant liver tumors (OMTs) and 50 healthy controls (HCs). A test dataset (169 patients with HCC and 139 with CLD) was used to test the performance of GAAP.

resultsThe GALAD-C and GAAP models achieved comparable performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.922 vs 0.914), and both were superior to GALAD, PIVKA-II, AFP, and AFP-L3% (AUCs, 0.891, 0.869, 0.750, and 0.711) for discrimination of HCC from CLD for the entire dataset. The AUCs of the GALAD, GALAD-C and GAAP models were excellent for the hepatitis C virus (HCV) subgroup (0.939, 0.958 and 0.954), and for discrimination HCC from HCs (0.988, 0.982, and 0.979), but were relatively lower for the HBV subgroup (0.855, 0.904, and 0.894), and for HCC within Milan Criteria (0.810, 0.841, and 0.840). They were not superior to AFP (0.873) for discrimination of HCC from OMT (0.873, 0.809, and 0.823). GAAP achieved an AUC of 0.922 in the test dataset.

conclusionGALAD was excellent for discrimination of HCC from CLD in the HCV subgroup of a cohort of Chinese patients. The GAAP and GALAD-C models achieved better performance compared with GALAD. These three models exhibited better performance in patients with an HCV etiology than those with HBV.

Indexed as

alpha-fetoproteinGALADhepatocellular carcinomaPIVKA-II

Identifiers

PMID33123501
PMCPMC7591054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.