ReviewCureus2020
Contrast Extravasation Post Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Cerebral Stroke: A Review and Recommendations for Future Studies.
Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subarachnoid contrast staining not attributable to endovascular therapy.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- The delayed spectral sign in Post-transfer CT imaging: an imaging marker of stroke severity and hemorrhagic risk.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Standardising mechanical thrombectomy complication reporting: A Delphi consensus study to support guidance for national audit.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
- AI-Assisted Edema Map Optimization Improves Infarction Detection in Twin-Spiral Dual-Energy CT.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- The Effectiveness of Deep Learning in the Differential Diagnosis of Hemorrhagic Transformation and Contrast Accumulation After Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Analysis of 90-day risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with postoperative CT with hyperdense signs after thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Implications of Subarachnoid Hyperdensities on Flat-Panel Detector CT following Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Anterior Circulation Acute Ischemic Stroke.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Quantification of ischemic brain edema after mechanical thrombectomy using dual-energy computed tomography in patients with ischemic stroke.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Association Between Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption and Stroke-Associated Pneumonia in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients After Endovascular Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Article
- Determinants and Clinical Relevance of Iodine Contrast Extravasation after Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Dual-Energy CT Study.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Delayed CTP-Derived Deep Venous Outflow: A Novel Predictor of Striatocapsular Infarction after M1 Thrombectomy.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022Article
- Contrast enhancement by location and volume is associated with long-term outcome after thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Cerebral hyperdensity on CT imaging (CTHD) post-reperfusion treatment in patients with acute cerebral stroke: understanding its clinical meaning.La Radiologia medica · 2022Article
- CT-based radiomics for differentiating intracranial contrast extravasation from intraparenchymal haemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy.European radiology · 2022Article
- More Retrieval Attempts are Associated with Poorer Functional Outcome After Unsuccessful Thrombectomy.Clinical neuroradiology · 2022Article
- Integrated Medical Care and the Continuous 4C Nursing Model to Improve Nursing Quality and Clinical Treatment of Patients with Acute Stroke: Based on a Retrospective Case-Control Study.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for cerebral revascularization in acute stroke is now considered standard of care in select patients. Patients are assessed routinely after MT with CT scanning. The phenomenon of contrast staining is well documented in the literature and is posited to be related to increased blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability of susceptible and/or infarcting brain tissue allowing angiographic contrast to be visualized outside the normal cerebral vasculature. In some cases, this can progress to include frank blood/contrast extravasation or even more seriously lead to intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) with less favorable clinical outcomes. The relationship of this staining phenomenon and how it may have a cause or effect relationship with progression to hemorrhage is unclear. Many studies have been performed trying to better characterize this radiographic finding in terms of accurate diagnosis and potential for influencing prognosis. A literature review included a glaring lack of standardization in the application of terminology and quantitative/qualitative analysis. Dual energy CT (DECT) appears to be the best imaging modality to differentiate blood from contrast, but its application is limited since it is not as available as conventional CT. The possibility that risk factors are associated with progression of mixed density (blood and contrast) extravasations to frank IPH with resultant poorer outcomes is suggested in some studies. Overall, there remains a lack of consensus on how to best interpret this radiographic finding in altering any future stroke treatment(s). Recommendations of how to overcome this are postulated by the authors, which include standardization of terminology, progression toward more DECT use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.