Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123423›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Timed Up and Go Test With a Cognitive Task: Correlations With Neuropsychological Measures in People With Parkinson's Disease.

Kübra Çekok, Turhan Kahraman, Gözde Duran, Berril Dönmez Çolakoğlu, Görsev Yener, Deniz Yerlikaya, Arzu Genç

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06246747 (The Use of Telerehabilitation to Improve Movement-related Outcomes and Quality of Life for Patients With Parkinson's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06246747 nacompletednot on this map

The Use of Telerehabilitation to Improve Movement-related Outcomes and Quality of Life for Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWizecareRan2020 to 2023Enrolled19ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsIn clinic physical therapy, Telerehabilitation only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kübra ÇekokPhysical Therapy, Medical Park Hospital, Izmir, TUR.
Turhan KahramanPhysiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, TUR.
Gözde DuranPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, TUR.
Berril Dönmez ÇolakoğluNeurology, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, TUR.
Görsev YenerNeurology, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, TUR.
Deniz YerlikayaPsychology, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, TUR.
Arzu GençPhysical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a simple and widely used clinical test for the assessment of lower extremity function, balance, mobility, and fall risk in various populations. The TUG has been found as a valid and reliable measure in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Besides, the addition of a cognitive task to the TUG (TUG-cognitive) enhances predictive validity related to fall risk in people with PD. However, further investigation is needed about the correlations of the TUG-cognitive test with neuropsychological measures in people with PD. Methods Thirty-three people with PD [modified Hoehn and Yahr scale, median (min-max)=2.5 (1.0-3.0)] participated in this cross-sectional study. The TUG was administered in the traditional way and with a cognitive task (counting backward by three from any number between 20 and 100). Neuropsychological measures included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Trail Making Test (TMT), and the Simple Reaction Time (SRT) test for stepping. The self-reported number of falls in the last six months was also recorded. Results The TUG-cognitive [13.1 (SD=8.5) seconds] was significantly longer than the TUG-traditional [12.2 (SD=8.1) seconds] (p<0.01). The TUG-cognitive significantly correlated with the MoCA [(rho=-0.712), TMT part A (TMT-A; rho=0.722), TMT part B (TMT-B; rho=0.694), SRT (rho=0.794), and number of falls (rho=0.960)] (p<0.01). The TUG-traditional also significantly correlated with the MoCA (rho=-0.682), TMT-A (rho=0.684), TMT-B (rho=0.746), SRT (rho=0.755), and number of falls (rho=0.702) (p<0.01). Conclusion Both the TUG-cognitive and TUG-traditional strongly correlated with neuropsychological measures; while the correlations were slightly stronger for the TUG-cognitive, the difference was not significant. The TUG-cognitive can be used in the clinical practice as a simple and more informative alternative to the TUG-traditional in people with PD.

Indexed as

executive functionneuropsychological testsparkinson’s diseasepostural balancereaction time

Identifiers

PMID33123423
PMCPMC7584288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.