ArticleThe Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management2020
Catheter Ablation of Left Ventricular Summit Arrhythmia in a Patient with Critical Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Sequential Approach.
Article in The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anatomical vs. electrophysiological approach for ablation of premature ventricular contractions originating from the left ventricular summit (ISESHIMA-SUMMIT Study).Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The left ventricular (LV) summit is the usual source of epicardial idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). A 56-year-old male patient presented to the cardiology outpatient clinic with palpitations and dyspnea. Twelve-lead electrocardiography performed on admission revealed monomorphic PVCs with precordial QRS transition in the V1 derivation and an rS pattern in the D1 derivation and inferior axis. An electrophysiology study and ablation procedure were planned. Activation mapping guided by a three-dimensional electroanatomic system was conducted to identify the earliest site of ventricular activation of the PVCs. During the PVCs, the earliest ventricular activation was observed within the great cardiac vein (GCV) and preceded the QRS onset by 37 ms. Coronary angiography was performed before ablation in the coronary venous system (CVS) to assess the distance from the coronary artery, which showed severe stenosis in the left circumflex artery. Then, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed to address the left circumflex artery stenosis. Anatomic catheter ablation was performed in the aortic cusp and endocardial LV outflow tract, the sites adjacent to the LV-summit PVC origin. However, successful ablation could not be achieved. Subsequently, an irrigated radiofrequency current was delivered in the GCV for 60 seconds, with the power being gradually increased to 30 W and with an irrigation flow rate of 30 mL/min. After ablation, under isoproterenol infusion and burst pacing from the right ventricle, no PVC or ventricular tachycardia was observed. Special precautions should be taken to avoid coronary artery damage during ablation from distal CVS. This approach may increase the success of ablation and avoid potential complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.