Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123376›Full record

ArticleEuropean Medical Journal. Reproductive health2020

Deep Learning strategies for Ultrasound in Pregnancy.

Pedro H B Diniz, Yi Yin, Sally Collins

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European Medical Journal. Reproductive health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pedro H B DinizUniversity of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health. Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
Yi YinUniversity of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health. Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
Sally CollinsUniversity of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health. Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
John Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Development of real-time, automated 3D ultrasound tools for the study of placental invasion and morphologyU01HD087209 · NICHD · HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI COLLINS, SALLY LOUISE, ZAMUDIO, STACY · 2015 to 2015
$3.3M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD087209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound is one of the most ubiquitous imaging modalities in clinical practice. It is cheap, does not require ionizing radiation and can be performed at the bedside, making it the most commonly utilized imaging technique in pregnancy. Despite these advantages, it does have some drawbacks such as relatively low imaging quality, low contrast, and high variability. With these constraints, automating the interpretation of ultrasound images is challenging. However, successful automated identification of structures within 3D ultrasound volumes has the potential to revolutionize clinical practice. For example, a small placental volume in the first trimester has been shown to be correlated to adverse outcome later in pregnancy. If the placenta could be segmented reliably and automatically from a static 3D ultrasound volume, it would facilitate the use of its estimated volume, and other morphological metrics, as part of a screening test for increased risk of pregnancy complications potentially improving clinical outcomes. Recently, deep learning has emerged, achieving state-of-the-art performance in various research fields, notably medical image analysis involving classification, segmentation, object detection, and tracking tasks. Due to its increased performance with large datasets, it has gained great interest in medical imaging applications. In this review, we present an overview of deep learning methods applied to ultrasound in pregnancy, introducing their architectures and analyzing their strategies. We then present some common problems and provide some perspectives into potential future research.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMorphometryPregnancySegmentationUltrasound Imaging

Identifiers

PMID33123376
PMCPMC7590498
OpenAlexW3036283278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.