Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123305›Full record

ArticleBayesian analysis2019

Efficient Bayesian Regularization for Graphical Model Selection.

Suprateek Kundu, Bani K Mallick, Veera Baladandayuthapan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bayesian analysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suprateek KunduDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, U.S.A.
Bani K MallickDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, 3143 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843-3143, U.S.A.
Veera BaladandayuthapanDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, Texas 77030, U.S.A.

Funding

Graph-based Bayesian analysis of Genomics and Proteomics DataR01CA194391 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN, MALLICK, BANI K · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Integrative methods for high-dimensional genomics dataR01CA160736 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BALADANDAYUTHAPANI, VEERABHADRAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160736NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been an intense development in the Bayesian graphical model literature over the past decade; however, most of the existing methods are restricted to moderate dimensions. We propose a novel graphical model selection approach for large dimensional settings where the dimension increases with the sample size, by decoupling model fitting and covariance selection. First, a full model based on a complete graph is fit under a novel class of mixtures of inverse-Wishart priors, which induce shrinkage on the precision matrix under an equivalence with Cholesky-based regularization, while enabling conjugate updates. Subsequently, a post-fitting model selection step uses penalized joint credible regions to perform model selection. This allows our methods to be computationally feasible for large dimensional settings using a combination of straightforward Gibbs samplers and efficient post-fitting inferences. Theoretical guarantees in terms of selection consistency are also established. Simulations show that the proposed approach compares favorably with competing methods, both in terms of accuracy metrics and computation times. We apply this approach to a cancer genomics data example.

Indexed as

Cholesky-based regularizationcovariance selectionjoint penalized credible regionsselection consistencyshrinkage priors

Identifiers

PMID33123305
PMCPMC7592715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.