ArticleOncology letters2020
Macrophages in Giemsa-stained cerebrospinal fluid specimens predict carcinomatous meningitis.
Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the therapeutic potential of a panel of novel VCAM-1 antibodies using microfluidic and three-dimensionalAntibody therapeutics · 2025Article
- The landscape and clinical impact of tumor-associated macrophages and PD-L1 in primary breast cancers and their brain metastases.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Inactivation of the Sts enzymes promotes resistance to lethalInfection and immunity · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carcinomatous meningitis is a condition in which tumor cells spread to the subarachnoid space. Leukocyte counting and typing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell components are performed manually or using flow cytometry. However, a detailed analysis of these variables using cytological specimens has not yet been reported. The present study analyzed cytological specimens using Giemsa staining and whole slide imaging with computer-assisted image analysis (CAIA) to clarify the characteristics of the leukocyte population in CSF, especially in carcinomatous meningitis. Manual evaluation was performed using 280 Giemsa-stained cytological CSF specimens. For 49 samples, CAIA was used for the whole area of Papanicolaou (Pap) staining, and Giemsa-stained specimens of the same samples were imaged using a virtual slide scanner. The nuclear morphology of the leukocytes was assessed, and the total leukocyte and leukocyte subset (lymphocytes, neutrophils and macrophages) counts were evaluated. Then, the number and percentage of each leukocyte subset population were evaluated. The total leukocyte count was significantly higher in Giemsa-stained specimens compared with in Pap-stained specimens. The percentage of macrophages was significantly higher in samples from patients with non-hematological tumors compared with in samples from patients without tumors, which was confirmed by manual evaluation of the specimens. In addition, the cut-off value of the percentage of macrophages that could discriminate between the tumor history negative cases and cytologically tumor positive cases was determined, revealing that a higher proportion of macrophages reflected the existence of atypical/malignant epithelial tumor cells in CSF samples. Thus, atypical cell screening and analysis of the background characteristics of the leukocyte population should be the focus of cytological specimen screening, especially not to miss carcinomatous meningitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.