ArticleOncology letters2020
Usefulness of serum miR-1246/miR-106b ratio in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Saliva and blood miRNAs as complementary biomarkers for esophageal cancer detection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- The Diagnostic Power of Circulating miR-1246 in Screening Cancer: An Updated Meta-analysis.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2023Pooled it
- Nanomaterial-based total analysis systems for isolation and detection of exosomal biomarkers in cancer diagnosis.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- miR-106b-5p as a Central Regulator of Cancer Progression and Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Identification and evaluation of a serum microRNA panel to diagnose colorectal cancer patients.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Identification of serum miR-1246 and miR-150-5p as novel diagnostic biomarkers for high-grade serous ovarian cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Integrative analysis of negatively regulated miRNA-mRNA axes for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2023Article
- The usefulness of microRNA in urine and saliva as a biomarker of gastroenterological cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2021Review
- Circulating MicroRNAs in Gastrointestinal Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
- The Abnormal Glycopatterns of Salivary Glycoproteins in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Article
- A Review on the Role of miR-1246 in the Pathoetiology of Different Cancers.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- Epigenetic Mechanisms in Breast Adenocarcinoma: Novel DNA Methylation Patterns.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The function of microRNAs (miRs) is associated with the development and progression of various malignancies, with miRs presenting stably in the serum. The current study assessed the role of miR-1246 and miR-106b in the serum of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). A comprehensive microarray analysis of miR expression was performed using the serum of patients with ESCC, which were subsequently validated via reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. A total of 55 test samples were obtained from Chiba University and 101 validation samples were gained from Chiba Cancer Center. The results revealed that miR-1246 expression significantly increased and miR-106b expression significantly decreased in each cohort. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) value of miR-1246 was 0.816 (sensitivity, 72.7%; specificity, 69.2%) and 0.779 (sensitivity, 71.3%; specificity, 70.6%) for the test and validation cohorts, respectively. The AUC of miR-106b was 0.716 (sensitivity, 65.5%; specificity, 61.6%) and 0.815 (sensitivity, 74.3%; specificity, 73.5%), respectively. In addition, the AUC of the miR-1246/miR-106b ratio was 0.901 (sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 80.0%) and 0.903 (sensitivity, 82.1%; specificity, 82.3%), respectively, which indicated a higher diagnostic ability compared with that of miR-1246 or miR-106b alone. The high miR-1246/miR-106b ratio group was associated with clinicopathological factors such as depth of invasion, progression, lymph node metastasis, and poor prognosis. Therefore, effective biomarkers may be generated by combining individual miRs obtained by comprehensive analysis of ESCC patient sera.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.