Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123261›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2020

Usefulness of serum miR-1246/miR-106b ratio in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Isamu Hoshino, Fumitaka Ishige, Yosuke Iwatate, Hisashi Gunji, Fumiaki Shiratori, Naoki Kuwayama, Yoshihiro Nabeya, Nobuyoshi Takeshita, Hisahiro Matsubara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Isamu HoshinoDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8717, Japan.
Fumitaka IshigeDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8717, Japan.
Yosuke IwatateDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8717, Japan.
Hisashi GunjiDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8717, Japan.
Fumiaki ShiratoriDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8717, Japan.
Naoki KuwayamaDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8717, Japan.
Yoshihiro NabeyaDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8717, Japan.
Nobuyoshi TakeshitaDivision of Surgical Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan.
Hisahiro MatsubaraDepartment of Frontier Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The function of microRNAs (miRs) is associated with the development and progression of various malignancies, with miRs presenting stably in the serum. The current study assessed the role of miR-1246 and miR-106b in the serum of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). A comprehensive microarray analysis of miR expression was performed using the serum of patients with ESCC, which were subsequently validated via reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. A total of 55 test samples were obtained from Chiba University and 101 validation samples were gained from Chiba Cancer Center. The results revealed that miR-1246 expression significantly increased and miR-106b expression significantly decreased in each cohort. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) value of miR-1246 was 0.816 (sensitivity, 72.7%; specificity, 69.2%) and 0.779 (sensitivity, 71.3%; specificity, 70.6%) for the test and validation cohorts, respectively. The AUC of miR-106b was 0.716 (sensitivity, 65.5%; specificity, 61.6%) and 0.815 (sensitivity, 74.3%; specificity, 73.5%), respectively. In addition, the AUC of the miR-1246/miR-106b ratio was 0.901 (sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 80.0%) and 0.903 (sensitivity, 82.1%; specificity, 82.3%), respectively, which indicated a higher diagnostic ability compared with that of miR-1246 or miR-106b alone. The high miR-1246/miR-106b ratio group was associated with clinicopathological factors such as depth of invasion, progression, lymph node metastasis, and poor prognosis. Therefore, effective biomarkers may be generated by combining individual miRs obtained by comprehensive analysis of ESCC patient sera.

Indexed as

esophageal squamous cell carcinomamicroRNA-106bmicroRNA-1246serum

Identifiers

PMID33123261
PMCPMC7586286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.