Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123187›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2020

Online Doctor Recommendation with Convolutional Neural Network and Sparse Inputs.

Yongjie Yan, Guang Yu, Xiangbin Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yongjie YanSchool of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1725-8206
Guang YuSchool of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8794-8205
Xiangbin YanSchool of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recommendation system in the online medical consultation website is a system to assist patients to find appropriate doctors. Based on the analysis of the current situation of the development of an online medical community (Haodf.com) in China, this paper puts forward recommendation suggestions of finding the right hospital and doctor to promote the rapid integration of Internet technology and traditional medical services. A new recommendation model called Probabilistic Matrix Factorization integrated with Convolutional Neural Network (PMF-CNN) is proposed in the paper. Doctors' data in Haodf.com were used to evaluate the performance of our system. The model improves the performance of medical consultation recommendations by fusing review text and doctor information based on CNN (Convolutional Neural Network). Specifically, CNN is used to learn the feature representation of the review text and the doctors' information. Furthermore, the extended matrix factorization model is exploited to fuse the review information feature and the initial value of the doctors' information for recommendation. As is shown in the experimental results on Haodf.com datasets, the proposed PMF-CNN achieves better recommendation performances than the other state-of-the-art recommendation algorithms. And the recommendation system in an online medical website improves the utilization efficiency of doctors and the balance of public health resources allocation.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerPhysiciansAlgorithmsChinaHumans

Identifiers

PMID33123187
PMCPMC7584959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.