Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33123140›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2020

Immunoglobulin A Isotype of Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does Not Provide Added Value for the Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome in a Chinese Population.

Chaojun Hu, Xi Li, Jiuliang Zhao, Qian Wang, Mengtao Li, Xinping Tian, Xiaofeng Zeng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Detection of IgA Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does not Improve Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification: A two-Center Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chaojun HuDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Xi LiDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Jiuliang ZhaoDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Qian WangDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Mengtao LiDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Xinping TianDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Xiaofeng ZengDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CNNational Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by the presence of anti-phospholipid (aPL) antibodies. However, the relationship between the immunoglobulin (Ig) A isotype of aPL positivity and its clinical utility in APS diagnosis is controversial. Presently, we determine the clinical utility of IgA-aPL from consecutive patients in a large cohort from the Chinese population and patients with APS whose aPL profiles were obtained. Methods: The detection of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β Results: In total, 1,082 out of 7,293 (2.55%) subjects had a positive IgA-aPL test, and the prevalence of isolated IgA-aPL was 0.29% (21/7,293) in the general population. The prevalence of IgA-aPL in the PAPS patients was 12.42% (19/153); however, only one patient (0.65%) presented with isolated IgA-aPL. Fifty (25.9%) of the SAPS had IgA-aPL, none of whom lacked IgG/IgM-aPL. The combination of the IgA isotype and the IgG/IgM isotype did not increase the diagnostic performance when compared with the IgG/IgM isotype of aCL or aβ Conclusion: Isolated IgA-aPL is rare in the general population as well as in patients with APS. Whether in the laboratory or in clinical practice, the presence of IgA-aPL does not provide added value for the diagnosis of APS in the Chinese population.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, AntiphospholipidAntiphospholipid SyndromeAsian PeopleFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin AMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntibodies, AntiphospholipidImmunoglobulin Aantiphospholipid syndromediagnostic valueIgA isotype of anticardiolipin antibodiesIgA isotype of antiphospholipid antibodiesIgA isotype of anti-β2 glycoprotein-I

Identifiers

PMID33123140
PMCPMC7573363
OpenAlexW3091782801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.