Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33122987›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Novel Porcine Retina Cultivation Techniques Provide Improved Photoreceptor Preservation.

Natalie Wagner, Sabrina Reinehr, Maurice R Gammel, Andrea Greulich, José Hurst, H Burkhard Dick, Sven Schnichels, Stephanie C Joachim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transcriptomic Analysis of Organotypic Porcine Retina Cultures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Are organ and co-cultures an alternative to animal models in ophthalmology?]Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Organ Cultures for Retinal Diseases.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natalie WagnerExperimental Eye Research Institute, University Eye Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Sabrina ReinehrExperimental Eye Research Institute, University Eye Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Maurice R GammelExperimental Eye Research Institute, University Eye Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Andrea GreulichExperimental Eye Research Institute, University Eye Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
José HurstUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, Tübingen, Germany.
H Burkhard DickExperimental Eye Research Institute, University Eye Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Sven SchnichelsUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, Tübingen, Germany.
Stephanie C JoachimExperimental Eye Research Institute, University Eye Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in industrialized countries among people over 60 years. It has multiple triggers and risk factors, but despite intense research efforts, its pathomechanisms are currently not completely understood. AMD pathogenesis is characterized by soft drusen in Bruch's membrane and involves the retinal pigment epithelium-Bruch's membrane-choroid complex and adjacent structures, like photoreceptors. This study explores the potential of novel cultivation techniques to preserve photoreceptors in retinal explants to gain better insights in AMD pathology. The porcine retina explants were cultured for 4 and 8 days using three different explantation techniques, namely, control (photoreceptors facing down, touching the filter), filter (photoreceptors facing up, turned sample using a filter), and tweezers (photoreceptors facing up, turned sample using tweezers). Optical coherence tomography revealed that the tweezers method had the best capacity to limit thinning of the retinal explants. Both novel methods displayed advantages in maintaining outer segment thickness. Additionally, immunofluorescence evaluation revealed a better preservation of opsin

Indexed as

age-related macular degenerationopsinoptical coherence tomographyorganotypic retina culturephotoreceptorporcinerhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID33122987
PMCPMC7573241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.