ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2020
Reference Values of the Central Corneal Thickness with Different Refractive Errors for the Adult Egyptian Population.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corneal Thickness, Curvature and Topographic Indices: Implications for Keratoconus Screening in a South African University Clinic Population.Clinical optometry · 2026Article
- The Underlying Relationship between Keratoconus and Down Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Longitudinal change in central corneal thickness among primary schoolchildren.Journal of optometryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo generate reference values of the central corneal thickness (CCT) with different refractive errors for the adult eastern Egyptian population. SUBJECTS AND
methodsThis study was a retrospective, observational, and cross-sectional study. It included 1166 eyes (1166 subjects) scheduled for LASIK, who came to private refractive eye centre, Ismailia, Egypt. The study period was from January 2018 to January 2020. The subjects were divided into a broad range of myopia with spherical equivalent (SE) ≤-0.5D and hyperopia (SE) ≥+0.5D. Then, the myopic eyes divided into low (SE>-3.0D), moderate (SE-3.0D to >-6.0D), and high (SE≤-6.0D). Similarly, the hyperopic eyes were divided into low (SE<+3.0D) and moderate (SE+3.0D to <+6.0D) and high ≥+6.0D. The refractive error was measured by an auto-refractometer, and CCT was measured using ultrasonic pachymetry.
resultsThe data of 556 myopic eyes in 556 subjects (31.1% males and 68.9% females) and 610 hyperopic subjects (34.4% males and 65.6% females) were included in this study. The mean±SD of CCT for the total myopic subjects was 532.8±32.6μm, range (470 to 627μm). The mean±SD of SE was -4.06±2.50D, range (-0.50 to -14.00D). The mean±SD of CCT for the total hyperopic subjects was 530.8±37.2μm, range (471 to 616μm). The mean±SD of SE was +3.57±1.98D, range (+0.50 to +8.50D). About 16.2% of the myopic eyes and 12.7% of the hyperopic eyes have CCT less than 500μm.
conclusionThe mean of the central corneal thickness of the eastern Egyptian population was 532.8μm for myopic and 530.8μm for hyperopic subjects, respectively. The myopic and hyperopic subjects show a reduction in CCT with age. Females have a thinner cornea than males, 16.2% of the myopic eyes and 12.7% of the hyperopic eyes have CCT less than 500μm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.