ArticleScientific reports2020
Risk factors and evaluation of keratoconus progression after penetrating keratoplasty with anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Collagen crosslinking-induced corneal morphological changes: a three-dimensional light sheet Microscopy-based evaluation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Late corneal ectasia after penetrating and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Long-term outcomes of deep anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- New dawn for keratoconus treatment: potential strategies for corneal stromal regeneration.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Review
- Recurrent Keratoconus: Corneal Transplants for Keratoconus Develop Tomographic Ectatic Changes.Cornea · 2023Article
- Vitamin D Supplementation Impacts Systemic Biomarkers of Collagen Degradation and Copper Metabolism in Patients With Keratoconus.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Observational
- Keratoconus: exploring fundamentals and future perspectives - a comprehensive systematic review.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine the risk factors and unique characteristics of keratoconus (KC) progression after penetrating keratoplasty (PK), anterior segment optical coherence tomography parameters were statistically analyzed in comparison with eyes undergoing PK for other diseases as a control. Ninety-one eyes maintaining clear PK grafts for over 10 years were divided into 2 groups according to the primary indication for PK (KC vs Others groups). Corneal thinning indicators (inferior host thinnest corneal thickness/central corneal thickness [IHT/CCT], inferior graft thinnest corneal thickness/CCT [IGT/CCT]), were smaller whereas anterior chamber depth, and steepest corneal power (Ks), and maximum corneal power (K
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.