Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33122747›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection is associated with shorter progression-free survival in advanced melanoma patients.

Gabriella Taques Marczynski, Ana Carolina Laus, Mariana Bisarro Dos Reis, Rui Manuel Reis, Vinicius de Lima Vazquez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Gabriella Taques MarczynskiMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, 1331, Antenor Duarte Villela St, Barretos, SP, 14784-400, Brazil.
Ana Carolina LausMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, 1331, Antenor Duarte Villela St, Barretos, SP, 14784-400, Brazil.
Mariana Bisarro Dos ReisMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, 1331, Antenor Duarte Villela St, Barretos, SP, 14784-400, Brazil.
Rui Manuel ReisMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, 1331, Antenor Duarte Villela St, Barretos, SP, 14784-400, Brazil.
Vinicius de Lima VazquezMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, 1331, Antenor Duarte Villela St, Barretos, SP, 14784-400, Brazil. viniciusvazquez@gmail.com.
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BRAF, NRAS and TERT mutations occur in more than 2/3 of melanomas. Its detection in patient's blood, as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), represents a possibility for identification and monitoring of metastatic disease. We proposed to standardize a liquid biopsy platform to identify hotspot mutations in BRAF, NRAS and TERT in plasma samples from advanced melanoma patients and investigate whether it was associated to clinical outcome. Firstly, we performed digital polymerase chain reaction using tumor cell lines for validation and determination of limit of detection (LOD) of each assay and screened plasma samples from healthy individuals to determine the limit of blank (LOB). Then, we selected 19 stage III and IV patients and determined the somatic mutations status in tumor tissue and track them in patients' plasma. We established a specific and sensitive methodology with a LOD ranging from 0.13 to 0.37%, and LOB ranging from of 0 to 5.201 copies/reaction. Somatic mutations occurred in 17/19 (89%) patients, of whom seven (41%) had ctDNA detectable their paired plasma. ctDNA detection was associated with shorter progression free survival (p = 0.01). In conclusion, our data support the use of ctDNA as prognosis biomarker, suggesting that patients with detectable levels have an unfavorable outcome.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansLimit of DetectionLiquid BiopsyMaleMelanomaMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedMutationPolymerase Chain ReactionBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanCirculating Tumor DNAGTP PhosphohydrolasesMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafTelomeraseTERT protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33122747
PMCPMC7596487
OpenAlexW3097816349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.