Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33122666›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Comparison of manual and machine learning image processing approaches to determine fungiform papillae on the tongue.

Camilla Cattaneo, Jing Liu, Chenhao Wang, Ella Pagliarini, Jon Sporring, Wender L P Bredie

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Determination of Fungiform Papilla Number Using Deep Learning Methods.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Camilla CattaneoDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Jing LiuDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, Section for Food Design and Consumer Behaviour, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Chenhao WangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, 2100, København Ø, Denmark.
Ella PagliariniDepartment of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Jon SporringDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, 2100, København Ø, Denmark.
Wender L P BredieDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, Section for Food Design and Consumer Behaviour, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. wb@food.ku.dk.
University of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human taste perception is associated with the papillae on the tongue as they contain a large proportion of chemoreceptors for basic tastes and other chemosensation. Especially the density of fungiform papillae (FP) is considered as an index for responsiveness to oral chemosensory stimuli. The standard procedure for FP counting involves visual identification and manual counting of specific parts of the tongue by trained operators. This is a tedious task and automated image analysis methods are desirable. In this paper a machine learning image processing method based on a convolutional neural network is presented. This automated method was compared with three standard manual FP counting procedures using tongue pictures from 132 subjects. Automated FP counts, within the selected areas and the whole tongue, significantly correlated with the manual counting methods (all ρs ≥ 0.76). When comparing the images for gender and PROP status, the density of FP predicted from automated analysis was in good agreement with data from the manual counting methods, especially in the case of gender. Moreover, the present results reinforce the idea that caution should be applied in considering the relationship between FP density and PROP responsiveness since this relationship can be an oversimplification of the complexity of phenomena arising at the central and peripherical levels. Indeed, no significant correlations were found between FP and PROP bitterness ratings using the automated method for selected areas or the whole tongue. Besides providing estimates of the number of FP, the machine learning approach used a tongue coordinate system that normalizes the size and shape of an individual tongue and generated a heat map of the FP position and normalized area they cover. The present study demonstrated that the machine learning approach could provide similar estimates of FP on the tongue as compared to manual counting methods and provide estimates of more difficult-to-measure parameters, such as the papillae's areas and shape.

Indexed as

Machine LearningFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleTaste BudsTaste PerceptionTongue

Identifiers

PMID33122666
PMCPMC7596097
OpenAlexW3096397746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.