Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33122624›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Multiple imputation for analysis of incomplete data in distributed health data networks.

Changgee Chang, Yi Deng, Xiaoqian Jiang, Qi Long

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cafe: Improved Federated Data Imputation by Leveraging Missing Data Heterogeneity.IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Changgee ChangUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3426-1295
Yi DengEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Xiaoqian JiangUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9933-2205
Qi LongUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. qlong@upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0660-5230
University of Pennsylvania · USEmory University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Advancing Analysis of Multi-omics Data in Alzheimer's Disease ResearchRF1AG063481 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LONG, QI · 2019 to 2020
$3.8M
Privacy-preserving methods and tools for handling missing data in distributed health data networksR01GM124111 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LONG, QI · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG063481NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distributed health data networks (DHDNs) leverage data from multiple sources or sites such as electronic health records (EHRs) from multiple healthcare systems and have drawn increasing interests in recent years, as they do not require sharing of subject-level data and hence lower the hurdles for collaboration between institutions considerably. However, DHDNs face a number of challenges in data analysis, particularly in the presence of missing data. The current state-of-the-art methods for handling incomplete data require pooling data into a central repository before analysis, which is not feasible in DHDNs. In this paper, we address the missing data problem in distributed environments such as DHDNs that has not been investigated previously. We develop communication-efficient distributed multiple imputation methods for incomplete data that are horizontally partitioned. Since subject-level data are not shared or transferred outside of each site in the proposed methods, they enhance protection of patient privacy and have the potential to strengthen public trust in analysis of sensitive health data. We investigate, through extensive simulation studies, the performance of these methods. Our methods are applied to the analysis of an acute stroke dataset collected from multiple hospitals, mimicking a DHDN where health data are horizontally partitioned across hospitals and subject-level data cannot be shared or sent to a central data repository.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisElectronic Health RecordsDelivery of Health CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID33122624
PMCPMC7596726
OpenAlexW3097027647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.