Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33122486›Full record

Observational studyAnatolian journal of cardiology2020

Treatment delays and in-hospital outcomes in acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide study.

Mustafa Kemal Erol, Meral Kayıkçıoğlu, Mustafa Kılıçkap, Arda Güler, Abdullah Yıldırım, Fatih Kahraman, Veysi Can, Sinan Inci, Sadettin Selçuk Baysal, Okan Er and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mustafa Kemal ErolDepartment of Cardiology, Şişli International Kolan Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey.
Meral KayıkçıoğluDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University; İzmir-Turkey.
Mustafa KılıçkapDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University; Ankara-Turkey.
Arda GülerDepartment of Cardiology, Health Science University, İstanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey.
Abdullah YıldırımDepartment of Cardiology, Health Science University, Adana City Hospital; Adana-Turkey.
Fatih KahramanDepartment of Cardiology, Kütahya Health Science University, Evliya Çelebi Training and Research Hospital; Kütahya-Turkey.
Veysi CanDepartment of Cardiology, Health Science University, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital; Bursa-Turkey.
Sinan InciDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Aksaray University; Aksaray-Turkey.
Sadettin Selçuk BaysalDepartment of Cardiology, Health Science University, Mehmet Akif Training and Research Hospital; Urfa-Turkey.
Okan ErDepartment of Cardiology, Denizli State Hospital; Denizli-Turkey.
Utku ZeybeyDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Trakya University; Edirne-Turkey.
Çağrı KafkasDepartment of Cardiology, Health Science University, Kartal Koşuyolu Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey.
Çağrı YaylaDepartment of Cardiology, Health Science University, Ankara City Hospital; Ankara-Turkey.
Can Baba ArinDepartment of Cardiology, Health Science University, Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey.
Ibrahim AktaşDepartment of Cardiology, Health Science University, Van Training and Research Hospital; Van-Turkey.
Ahmet Arif YalçınDepartment of Cardiology, Health Science University, İstanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey.
Ömer GençDepartment of Cardiology, Health Science University, Adana City Hospital; Adana-Turkey.
Memorial Sisli Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDelayed admission of myocardial infarction (MI) patients is an important prognostic factor. In the present nationwide registry (TURKMI-2), we evaluated the treatment delays and outcomes of patients with acute MI during the Covid-19 pandemic and compaired with a recentpre-pandemic registry (TURKMI-1).

methodsThe pandemic and pre-pandemic studies were conducted prospectively as 15-day snapshot registries in the same 48 centers. The inclusion criteria for both registries were aged ≥18 years and a final diagnosis of acute MI (AMI) with positive troponin levels. The only difference between the 2 registries was that the pre-pandemic (TURKMI-1) registry (n=1872) included only patients presenting within the first 48 hours after symptom-onset. TURKMI-2 enrolled all consecutive patients (n=1113) presenting with AMI during the pandemic period.

resultsA comparison of the patients with acute MI presenting within the 48-hour of symptom-onset in the pre-pandemic and pandemic registries revealed an overall 47.1% decrease in acute MI admissions during the pandemic. Median time from symptom-onset to hospital-arrival increased from 150 min to 185 min in patients with ST elevation MI (STEMI) and 295 min to 419 min in patients presenting with non-STEMI (NSTEMI) (p-values <0.001). Door-to-balloon time was similar in the two periods (37 vs. 40 min, p=0.448). In the pandemic period, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decreased, especially in the NSTEMI group (60.3% vs. 47.4% in NSTEMI, p<0.001; 94.8% vs. 91.1% in STEMI, p=0.013) but the decrease was not significant in STEMI patients admitted within 12 hours of symptom-onset (94.9% vs. 92.1%; p=0.075). In-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were significantly increased during the pandemic period [4.8% vs. 8.9%; p<0.001; age- and sex-adjusted Odds ratio (95% CI) 1.96 (1.20-3.22) for NSTEMI, p=0.007; and 2.08 (1.38-3.13) for STEMI, p<0.001].

conclusionThe present comparison of 2 nationwide registries showed a significant delay in treatment of patients presenting with acute MI during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although PCI was performed in a timely fashion, an increase in treatment delay might be responsible for the increased risk of MACE. Public education and establishing COVID-free hospitals are necessary to overcome patients' fear of using healthcare services and mitigate the potential complications of AMI during the pandemic. (Anatol J Cardiol 2020; 24: 334-42).

Indexed as

AgedCoronary AngiographyCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Emergency Medical ServicesFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPandemicsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPneumonia, ViralPrognosisRegistries

Identifiers

PMID33122486
PMCPMC7724394
OpenAlexW3089850004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.