ReviewJACC. Heart failure2020
A Standardized and Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.
Review in JACC. Heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 174 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Spoke-hub shock protocol management according to scai class in turin and milan area
The Role of Swan-Ganz Catheter in Hemodynamic Resuscitation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
Who cites it
174 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 365 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beta-blockers in acute decompensated heart failure with and without cardiogenic shock: Should we initiate, continue, or withdraw? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- SCAI/EAPCI/ACVC Expert Consensus Statement on Cardiogenic Shock in Women.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Guideline
- [Mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock associated with the use of microaxial flow pump: a systematic review and meta-analysis].Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2025Pooled it
- Hospital-Level Variations in Outcomes and Readmissions Among Patients With STEMI and Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Mechanical Circulatory Support: Insights From a National Cohort.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Implementation of a standardized Impella-specific management pathway in cardiogenic shock.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Integrating bibliometric analysis and external validation of the SAVE score in VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: insights from global trends and the MIMIC-IV database.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Intra-aortic Balloon Pump-Supported Cardiogenic Shock Among Patients Transferred to Tertiary Care Centers.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Current Approaches to the Management of Acute Surgical and Medical Emergencies: A Structured Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Management, Outcomes and Future Directions.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Modulation of the Vasopressin System in Distributive and Cardiogenic Shock: Theoretical Principles and Practical Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Prognostic validation and risk stratification of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions cardiogenic shock classification in a large, real-world intensive care unit cohort in South Korea.Acute and critical care · 2026Article
- Advanced Cardiogenic-shock Team versus standard care in cardiogenic SHOCK: a single centre service evaluation project.Open heart · 2026Article
- An Integrative Review of the Cardiovascular Disease Spectrum: Integrating Multi-Omics and Artificial Intelligence for Precision Cardiology.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of the Shock Team on Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Lactate/albumin ratio predicts 90-day mortality of cardiogenic shock patients.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Short Term Outcomes and Resource Utilization in Patients Admitted for Infective Endocarditis Who Develop Pericardial Effusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of the atherogenic index of plasma combined with lactate-to-albumin ratio for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- MiRNA Regulations in Cardiotoxicity Induced by Oncologic Therapies and Possible Immune Response.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- The rise of point-of-care ultrasound in cardiopulmonary diagnostics.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Review
- A Deep Learning Model to Guide Personalized Mechanical Circulatory Support Use in Cardiogenic Shock Patients Undergoing PCI.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
114 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock is a hemodynamically complex syndrome characterized by a low cardiac output that often culminates in multiorgan system failure and death. Despite recent advances, clinical outcomes remain poor, with mortality rates exceeding 40%. In the absence of adequately powered randomized controlled trials to guide therapy, best practices for shock management remain nonuniform. Emerging data from North American registries, however, support the use of standardized protocols focused on rapid diagnosis, early intervention, ongoing hemodynamic assessment, and multidisciplinary longitudinal care. In this review, the authors examine the pathophysiology and phenotypes of cardiogenic shock, benefits and limitations of current therapies, and they propose a standardized and team-based treatment algorithm. Lastly, they discuss future research opportunities to address current gaps in clinical knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.