Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33121605›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Dental Association (1939)2020

Prescribing of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infective endocarditis.

Martin H Thornhill, Teresa B Gibson, Michael J Durkin, Mark J Dayer, Peter B Lockhart, Patrick T O'Gara, Larry M Baddour

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Infective Endocarditis Risk After Invasive Dental Procedures.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Prescription practices of antibiotic prophylaxis among patients at high risk of infective endocarditis.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Wissen kompakt : Fortbildung fur Zahnarzte · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin H Thornhill
Teresa B Gibson
Michael J Durkin
Mark J Dayer
Peter B Lockhart
Patrick T O'Gara
Larry M Baddour
Carolinas Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USIBM (United States) · USTaunton & Somerset NHS Foundation Trust · GBWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (KL2) KL2TR002346 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Dominic N Reeds · 2017 to 2026
$14.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002346NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000609NIAID NIH HHS L30 AI133778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2007, the American Heart Association recommended that antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) be restricted to those at high risk of developing complications due to infective endocarditis (IE) undergoing invasive dental procedures. The authors aimed to estimate the appropriateness of AP prescribing according to type of dental procedure performed in patients at high risk, moderate risk, or low or unknown risk of developing IE complications.

methodsEighty patients at high risk, 40 patients at moderate risk, and 40 patients at low or unknown risk of developing IE complications were randomly selected from patients with linked dental care, health care, and prescription benefits data in the IBM MarketScan Databases, one of the largest US health care convenience data samples. Two clinicians independently analyzed prescription and dental procedure data to determine whether AP prescribing was likely, possible, or unlikely for each dental visit.

resultsIn patients at high risk of developing IE complications, 64% were unlikely to have received AP for invasive dental procedures, and in 32 of 80 high-risk patients (40%) there was no evidence of AP for any dental visit. When AP was prescribed, several different strategies were used to provide coverage for multiple dental visits, including multiday courses, multidose prescriptions, and refills, which sometimes led to an oversupply of antibiotics.

conclusionsAP prescribing practices were inconsistent, did not always meet the highest antibiotic stewardship standards, and made retrospective evaluation difficult. For those at high risk of developing IE complications, there appears to be a concerning level of underprescribing of AP for invasive dental procedures. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Some dentists might be failing to fully comply with American Heart Association recommendations to provide AP cover for all invasive dental procedures in those at high risk of developing IE complications.

Indexed as

EndocarditisEndocarditis, BacterialAmerican Heart AssociationAntibiotic ProphylaxisHumansRetrospective Studiesantibiotic prophylaxisantibiotic stewardshipdental proceduresguidelinesInfective endocarditispreventionrisk

Identifiers

PMID33121605
PMCPMC7959887
OpenAlexW3094813991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.