Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33121528›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2020

Long-term safety and effectiveness of etanercept in JIA: an 18-year experience from the BiKeR registry.

Giulia Armaroli, Ariane Klein, Gerd Ganser, Michael J Ruehlmann, Frank Dressler, Anton Hospach, Kirsten Minden, Ralf Trauzeddel, Ivan Foeldvari, Jasmin Kuemmerle-Deschner and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. How Safe Are Biological Agents in Pediatric Rheumatology?Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Tuberculosis in children and adolescents with rheumatic diseases using biologic agents: an integrative review.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Giulia ArmaroliDivision of Paediatric Rheumatology, Sankt Augustin Asklepios Children's Hospital, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany. g.armaroli@asklepios.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6429-6718
Ariane KleinDivision of Paediatric Rheumatology, Sankt Augustin Asklepios Children's Hospital, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany.
Gerd GanserDivision of Paediatric Rheumatology, Northwest German Rheumatology Center, St. Josef Stift, Sendenhorst, Germany.
Michael J RuehlmannPaediatric Rheumatology Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany.
Frank DresslerDivision of Paediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Anton HospachDivision of Paediatric Rheumatology, Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Kirsten MindenGerman Rheumatism Research Center, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Ralf TrauzeddelDepartment of Paediatrics, Berlin-Buch Helios Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Ivan FoeldvariPaediatric Rheumatology Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Jasmin Kuemmerle-DeschnerDepartment of Paediatrics, Tuebingen University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Frank Weller-HeinemannDivision of Paediatric Rheumatology, Prof. Hess Children's Hospital, Bremen, Germany.
Andreas UrbanDepartment of Paediatrics, St. Marien Hospital, Amberg, Germany.
Gerd HorneffDivision of Paediatric Rheumatology, Sankt Augustin Asklepios Children's Hospital, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEAsklepios Klinik Sankt Augustin · DEGerman Rheumatism Research Centre · DEHelios Hospital Berlin-Buch · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DENephrologisches Zentrum Goettingen · DEOlgahospital · DEProf. Hess Kinderklinik · DESt. Marien Hospital · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt present, etanercept represents the most commonly prescribed biologic agent for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treatment. Children and adolescents with JIA are often treated with etanercept over long periods, sometimes even into adulthood. The objectives of this analysis were to determine the long-term safety of etanercept compared to a biologic-naïve cohort and to assess the long-term treatment response upon continuous etanercept exposure using data from the German biologics registry (BiKeR).

methodsJIA patients newly exposed to etanercept were documented in the BiKeR registry from January 2001 to March 2019, and baseline characteristics, effectiveness, and safety parameters were analysed. Response to treatment was assessed according to 10-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS10), JADAS-defined minimal disease activity and remission, JIA-American College of Rheumatology (ACR) improvement criteria, and ACR-inactive disease definition. Safety assessments were based on adverse event (AE) reports.

resultsA total of 2725 new etanercept users with a diagnosis of JIA were registered. Of these, etanercept was received as a first-line biologic by 95.8% and as monotherapy without concomitant methotrexate by 31.5%. After nine years on continuous treatment, 68.1% of patients presented minimal disease activity, 43.1% JADAS-defined remission on drug, and 36.6% ACR-inactive disease. JIA-ACR30/50/70/90 response rates were still 82/79/71/54% after nine years of treatment. Overall, 2053 AEs (34.3/100PY), including 226 serious AEs (SAE, 3.8/100PY), were observed upon etanercept, compared to 1345 AEs [35.6/100PY; p = 0.3] and 52 SAEs (1.4/100PY; p = 0.0001) in the biologic-naïve cohort. Respective exposure-adjusted rates for etanercept and biologic-naïve patients were 0.9/100PY and 0.2/100PY (p = 0.0001) for serious infections, 0.4/100PY and 0.1/100PY (p = 0.01) for zoster reactivation, 0.3/100PY and 0.03/100PY (p = 0.015) for inflammatory bowel disease, and 1.9/100PY and 1.4/100PY (p = 0.09) for uveitis. Three and two malignancies were documented in the etanercept and biologic-naïve groups, as well as three and one deaths, respectively.

conclusionsNo new safety signal was observed, especially no increased risk for malignancies or autoimmune disorders other than inflammatory bowel disease. However, SAEs and serious infections, though infrequent, were more often reported on etanercept than in biologic-naïve patients. In addition, etanercept demonstrated a long-term maintenance of clinical benefits up to nine years of continuous treatment.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, JuvenileAdolescentAdultChildEtanerceptHumansRegistriesTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsEtanerceptBiologics registryDrug surveillanceEtanerceptJIA treatmentJuvenile Idiopathic ArthritisTNF inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33121528
PMCPMC7597050
OpenAlexW3096478191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.