ArticleArthritis research & therapy2020
Long-term safety and effectiveness of etanercept in JIA: an 18-year experience from the BiKeR registry.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- PAFLAR guidelines for oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Guideline
- 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Therapeutic Approaches for Oligoarthritis, Temporomandibular Joint Arthritis, and Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.Arthritis care & research · 2022Guideline
- 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Therapeutic Approaches for Oligoarthritis, Temporomandibular Joint Arthritis, and Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Guideline
- Adenosine deaminase type 2 deficiency: From rare to common.Journal of human immunity · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in the Pharmacological Management of Pediatric Spondyloarthritis.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
- Inflammatory bowel diseases: pathological mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Advances in tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Musculoskeletal manifestations in children with inflammatory bowel disease: a multicenter cohort study (GASTROREUM study).Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Article
- Clinical remission rate and drug withdrawal status in articular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Observational
- Update on Biologic Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Five-year Narrative Review.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2025Review
- [Course of the COVID-19 pandemic in pediatric rheumatological patients in Germany during the first 3 years (2020-2022)].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2024Article
- Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part II: Risk of Infections. A Narrative Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2024Review
- Serum and salivary inflammatory biomarkers in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-an explorative cross-sectional study.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2024Article
- How Safe Are Biological Agents in Pediatric Rheumatology?Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Reversing the Inflammatory Process-25 Years of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- Etanercept for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: drug levels and influence of concomitant methotrexate: observational study.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2023Observational
- Tuberculosis in children and adolescents with rheumatic diseases using biologic agents: an integrative review.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2023Review
- Conception of National Biologics Registry for Pediatric Rheumatology: Need of the Hour and the Way Forward.Indian pediatrics · 2022Article
- Outcome of adult patients with JIA treated with the biosimilar BenepaliArthritis research & therapy · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAt present, etanercept represents the most commonly prescribed biologic agent for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treatment. Children and adolescents with JIA are often treated with etanercept over long periods, sometimes even into adulthood. The objectives of this analysis were to determine the long-term safety of etanercept compared to a biologic-naïve cohort and to assess the long-term treatment response upon continuous etanercept exposure using data from the German biologics registry (BiKeR).
methodsJIA patients newly exposed to etanercept were documented in the BiKeR registry from January 2001 to March 2019, and baseline characteristics, effectiveness, and safety parameters were analysed. Response to treatment was assessed according to 10-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS10), JADAS-defined minimal disease activity and remission, JIA-American College of Rheumatology (ACR) improvement criteria, and ACR-inactive disease definition. Safety assessments were based on adverse event (AE) reports.
resultsA total of 2725 new etanercept users with a diagnosis of JIA were registered. Of these, etanercept was received as a first-line biologic by 95.8% and as monotherapy without concomitant methotrexate by 31.5%. After nine years on continuous treatment, 68.1% of patients presented minimal disease activity, 43.1% JADAS-defined remission on drug, and 36.6% ACR-inactive disease. JIA-ACR30/50/70/90 response rates were still 82/79/71/54% after nine years of treatment. Overall, 2053 AEs (34.3/100PY), including 226 serious AEs (SAE, 3.8/100PY), were observed upon etanercept, compared to 1345 AEs [35.6/100PY; p = 0.3] and 52 SAEs (1.4/100PY; p = 0.0001) in the biologic-naïve cohort. Respective exposure-adjusted rates for etanercept and biologic-naïve patients were 0.9/100PY and 0.2/100PY (p = 0.0001) for serious infections, 0.4/100PY and 0.1/100PY (p = 0.01) for zoster reactivation, 0.3/100PY and 0.03/100PY (p = 0.015) for inflammatory bowel disease, and 1.9/100PY and 1.4/100PY (p = 0.09) for uveitis. Three and two malignancies were documented in the etanercept and biologic-naïve groups, as well as three and one deaths, respectively.
conclusionsNo new safety signal was observed, especially no increased risk for malignancies or autoimmune disorders other than inflammatory bowel disease. However, SAEs and serious infections, though infrequent, were more often reported on etanercept than in biologic-naïve patients. In addition, etanercept demonstrated a long-term maintenance of clinical benefits up to nine years of continuous treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.