Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33121514›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2020

Urban gardening and neglected and underutilized species in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Manuela Alves da Cunha, Lidice Almeida Arlego Paraguassú, José Geraldo de Aquino Assis, Arthur Benjamin de Paula Carvalho Silva, Ryzia de Cassia Vieira Cardoso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manuela Alves da CunhaEscola de Nutrição, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Basílio Gama Street, Canela Campus, Salvador, Bahia, 40110-907, Brazil. manuelanutri@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4426-7829
Lidice Almeida Arlego ParaguassúInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Bahia, Emídio dos Santos Street, Barbalho Campus, Salvador, Bahia, 40301-015, Brazil.
José Geraldo de Aquino AssisInstituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 668, Barão de Jeremoabo Street, Ondina Campus, Salvador, Bahia, 40170-115, Brazil.
Arthur Benjamin de Paula Carvalho SilvaFaculdades Integradas São Pedro - FAESA, 2220, Vitória Avenue, Monte Belo, Vitória, Espírito Santo, 29053-360, Brazil.
Ryzia de Cassia Vieira CardosoEscola de Nutrição, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Basílio Gama Street, Canela Campus, Salvador, Bahia, 40110-907, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrban agriculture has been evidenced as a food production and environmental sustainability strategy, although it faces many obstacles in Latin American countries. Additionally, in urban areas, low consumption of fruit and greenery is noticeable, along with loss in food diversity, including the neglected and underutilized species (NUS), which involve potential to strengthen local food systems. For this reason, this work has sought to map urban gardens in the city of Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, characterizing their gardeners, and to systematize information regarding food produced and the use of NUS.

methodsThe municipality's urban gardens were mapped and data was collected from the gardeners. The study included two steps: (i) garden localization; (ii) on-site visits for interviews with gardeners and verification of cultivated food, destination of production, availability, and use of NUS.

resultsEighteen active food gardens were located, seventeen of which participated in the study: eight (8) communal (UCG) and nine (9) private (UPG). Respondents were on average 55.76 years old, mostly (52.9%) male, working at UPG (88.9%). Women predominated in the UCG (87.5%), with higher levels of education. For 52.9% of the interviewees, the garden was their main source of income. Food produced at the urban gardens was consumed by 82.4% of the gardeners and their families. In 70.6% of the gardens, production was also sold, while 47.1% donated. During the survey, 59 NUS were found and 76.5% of respondents reported consuming 19 of the species. NUS leaves, fruits, and seeds were found to be eaten raw, boiled, or sautéed in various preparations, especially Coleus amboinicus Lour. (76.5%), Eryngium foetidum L. (35.3%), Talinum fruticosum (L.) Juss., and Pereskia aculeata Mill (both 29.4%). Occurrence and utilization of NUS did not present significant associations with the gardens or gardeners (p > 0.05).

conclusionsSalvador urban gardens, even in small numbers and without government support, have produced affordable food for the local population, preserved food diversity, and the tradition of NUS cultivation and use. Thus, urban gardens are reaffirmed as relevant spaces that should be included in public policies in order to promote food and nutritional security, biodiversity, and urban environmental sustainability.

Indexed as

GardeningBrazilCitiesCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironment DesignFemaleFood SupplyGardensHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlants, EdibleFood and nutrition securityFood systemsGenetic heritageUrban agriculture

Identifiers

PMID33121514
PMCPMC7596975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.