Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33121462›Full record

Observational studyBMC public health2020

Relationship between social support status and mortality in a community-based population: a prospective observational study (Yamagata study).

Tsutomu Uzuki, Tsuneo Konta, Ritsuko Saito, Ri Sho, Tsukasa Osaki, Masayoshi Souri, Masafumi Watanabe, Kenichi Ishizawa, Hidetoshi Yamashita, Yoshiyuki Ueno and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tsutomu UzukiDivision of Nursing, Yamagata University Hospital, Yamagata, Japan.
Tsuneo KontaDepartment of Public Health and Hygiene, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, 2-2-2, Iida-Nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan. kkonta@med.id.yamagata-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7681-6469
Ritsuko SaitoDivision of Nursing, Yamagata University Hospital, Yamagata, Japan.
Ri ShoDepartment of Public Health and Hygiene, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, 2-2-2, Iida-Nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Tsukasa OsakiDepartment of Public Health and Hygiene, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, 2-2-2, Iida-Nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Masayoshi SouriDepartment of Public Health and Hygiene, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, 2-2-2, Iida-Nishi, Yamagata, 990-9585, Japan.
Masafumi WatanabeGlobal Center of Excellence Program Study Group, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Kenichi IshizawaGlobal Center of Excellence Program Study Group, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Hidetoshi YamashitaGlobal Center of Excellence Program Study Group, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Yoshiyuki UenoGlobal Center of Excellence Program Study Group, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Takamasa KayamaGlobal Center of Excellence Program Study Group, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Yamagata University · JPYamagata University Hospital · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Global COE programJapan Society for the Promotion of Science the 21st Century Center of Excellence (COE)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial support, defined as the exchange of support in social relationships, plays a vital role in maintaining healthy behavior and mitigating the effects of stressors. This study investigated whether functional aspect of social support is related to 5-year mortality in health checkup participants.

methodsThis study recruited 16,651 subjects (6797 males, 9854 females). Social support was evaluated using five-component questions: Do you have someone 1) whom you can consult when you are in trouble? 2) whom you can consult when your physical condition is not good? 3) who can help you with daily homework? 4) who can take you to hospital when you don't feel well? and 5) who can take care of you when you are ill in bed? The association between the component of social support and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was examined using Cox proportional hazard analysis.

resultsThe percentage of subjects without social support components was 7.7-15.0%. They were more likely to be male, non-elderly, and living alone. During the follow-up period, there were 166 all-cause and 38 cardiovascular deaths. Cox proportional analysis adjusted for confounders showed that only the lack of support for transportation to hospital was significantly associated with all-cause (hazard ratio [HR] 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-3.05) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 3.30, 95% CI 1.41-6.87). These associations were stronger in males than females.

conclusionThis study showed that the lack of social support for transportation to the hospital was independently associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a community-based population.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesSocial SupportCause of DeathEmotionsFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleMiddle AgedMortalityProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsCohortMortalitySocial support

Identifiers

PMID33121462
PMCPMC7597005
OpenAlexW3096458581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.