Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33121206›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

The Status of Soil Microbiome as Affected by the Application of Phosphorus Biofertilizer: Fertilizer Enriched with Beneficial Bacterial Strains.

Mateusz Mącik, Agata Gryta, Lidia Sas-Paszt, Magdalena Frąc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Reflections on microbial genetic resources in agricultural systems.Current research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mateusz MącikInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4, 20-290 Lublin, Poland.
Agata GrytaInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4, 20-290 Lublin, Poland.
Lidia Sas-PasztInstitute of Horticulture in Skierniewice, Pomologiczna 18, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland.
Magdalena FrącInstitute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4, 20-290 Lublin, Poland.

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju BIOSTRATEG3/347464/5/NCBR/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regarding the unfavourable changes in agroecosystems resulting from the excessive application of mineral fertilizers, biopreparations containing live microorganisms are gaining increasing attention. We assumed that the application of phosphorus mineral fertilizer enriched with strains of beneficial microorganisms contribute to favourable changes in enzymatic activity and in the genetic and functional diversity of microbial populations inhabiting degraded soils. Therefore, in field experiments conditions, the effects of phosphorus fertilizer enriched with bacterial strains on the status of soil microbiome in two chemically degraded soil types (Brunic Arenosol - BA and Abruptic Luvisol - AL) were investigated. The field experiments included treatments with an optimal dose of phosphorus fertilizer (without microorganisms - FC), optimal dose of phosphorus fertilizer enriched with microorganisms including

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyArchaeaBacillus amyloliquefaciensBacteriaBacterial ProteinsBiodiversityEnzymesFertilizersFungiHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrobiotaPaenibacillus polymyxaPhosphorusPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNABacterial ProteinsEnzymesFertilizersPhosphorusbiodiversitybiofertilizersdegraded soilssoil microorganismssustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID33121206
PMCPMC7663420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.