Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33120959›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Multimodal Intention Detection Sensor Suite for Shared Autonomy of Upper-Limb Robotic Prostheses.

Marcus Gardner, C Sebastian Mancero Castillo, Samuel Wilson, Dario Farina, Etienne Burdet, Boo Cheong Khoo, S Farokh Atashzar, Ravi Vaidyanathan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marcus GardnerMoonshine Inc., London W12 0LN, UK.
C Sebastian Mancero CastilloDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, UK Dementia Research Institute Care-Research and Technology Centre (DRI-CRT) Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6020-4695
Samuel WilsonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, UK Dementia Research Institute Care-Research and Technology Centre (DRI-CRT) Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Dario FarinaDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Etienne BurdetDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Boo Cheong KhooDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4710-4598
S Farokh AtashzarDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New York University, New York, NY 11201, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8495-8440
Ravi VaidyanathanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, UK Dementia Research Institute Care-Research and Technology Centre (DRI-CRT) Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9625-4544
UK Dementia Research Institute · GBImperial College London · GBNational University of Singapore · SGNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurorobotic augmentation (e.g., robotic assist) is now in regular use to support individuals suffering from impaired motor functions. A major unresolved challenge, however, is the excessive cognitive load necessary for the human-machine interface (HMI). Grasp control remains one of the most challenging HMI tasks, demanding simultaneous, agile, and precise control of multiple degrees-of-freedom (DoFs) while following a specific timing pattern in the joint and human-robot task spaces. Most commercially available systems use either an indirect mode-switching configuration or a limited sequential control strategy, limiting activation to one DoF at a time. To address this challenge, we introduce a shared autonomy framework centred around a low-cost multi-modal sensor suite fusing: (a) mechanomyography (MMG) to estimate the intended muscle activation, (b) camera-based visual information for integrated autonomous object recognition, and (c) inertial measurement to enhance intention prediction based on the grasping trajectory. The complete system predicts user intent for grasp based on measured dynamical features during natural motions. A total of 84 motion features were extracted from the sensor suite, and tests were conducted on 10 able-bodied and 1 amputee participants for grasping common household objects with a robotic hand. Real-time grasp classification accuracy using visual and motion features obtained 100%, 82.5%, and 88.9% across all participants for detecting and executing grasping actions for a bottle, lid, and box, respectively. The proposed multimodal sensor suite is a novel approach for predicting different grasp strategies and automating task performance using a commercial upper-limb prosthetic device. The system also shows potential to improve the usability of modern neurorobotic systems due to the intuitive control design.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsRoboticsUpper ExtremityElectromyographyHandHumansIntentionmechanomyographyprosthetic technologyshared autonomy

Identifiers

PMID33120959
PMCPMC7662487
OpenAlexW3096529724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.