Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33120951›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Custom-Made Orthodontic Mini-Implant-Effect of Insertion Angle and Cortical Bone Thickness on Stress Distribution with a Complex In Vitro and In Vivo Biosafety Profile.

Adelina Popa, Cristina Dehelean, Horia Calniceanu, Claudia Watz, Silviu Brad, Cosmin Sinescu, Olivia A Marcu, Casiana Simina Popa, Stefana Avram, Mirela Nicolov and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development and Characterization of FeMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. In vitro study of the orthodontic mini-implants influence on the growth of human osteoblasts.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Adelina Popa2nd Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Cristina Dehelean2nd Department of Toxicology and Drug Industry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Horia Calniceanu1st Department/Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Claudia Watz1st Department of Pharmaceutical Physics and Biophysics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2498-4732
Silviu Brad2nd Department of Radiology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Cosmin Sinescu2nd Department of Prostheses Technology and Dental Material, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5651-7215
Olivia A MarcuDental Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.
Casiana Simina PopaPAN Dental X RAY, 310337 Arad, Romania.
Stefana Avram2nd Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Mirela Nicolov1st Department of Pharmaceutical Physics and Biophysics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Camelia A Szuhanek2nd Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrthodontic mini-implant failure is a debatable subject in clinical practice. However, the most important parameter to evaluate the success rate of mini-implant is the primary stability, which is mainly influenced by cortical bone thickness (CBT) and insertion angle. MATERIALS AND

methodsThree-dimensional finite element models of the maxilla were created and a custom-made, self-drilling, tapered mini-implant was designed. For the pull-out test, 12 simulations were performed, sequentially increasing the thickness of the cortical bone (1, 1.5 and 2 mm) and the insertion angle (30°, 60°, 90°, 120°). For the force analysis, 24 simulations were performed using an experimental orthodontic traction force of 2 N both in the horizontal and vertical axis.

resultsInsertion angle and CBT have significant impact on force reaction values (

conclusionsWhen the CBT is reduced, we recommend inclined insertion while, when the CBT is appropriate, perpendicular insertion is advised.

Indexed as

cortical bone thicknessfinite element analysisHET-CAM assayHGFinsertion anglein vitro cytotoxicityorthodontic mini-implantsprimary stability

Identifiers

PMID33120951
PMCPMC7663474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.