Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33120915›Full record

ReviewInsects2020

Megan J Allman, Johanna E Fraser, Scott A Ritchie, D Albert Joubert, Cameron P Simmons, Heather A Flores

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. UnveilingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Wolbachia: Advancing into a Second Century.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Importance ofBiosafety and health · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. SymbioticFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Megan J AllmanInstitute of Vector-Borne Disease, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4169-8460
Johanna E FraserInstitute of Vector-Borne Disease, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia.
Scott A RitchieWorld Mosquito Program, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia.
D Albert JoubertWorld Mosquito Program, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia.
Cameron P SimmonsInstitute of Vector-Borne Disease, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia.
Heather A FloresInstitute of Vector-Borne Disease, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5003-7547
Monash University · AUAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine · AUOxford University Clinical Research Unit · VN

Funding

Department of Education, Skills and Employment, Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The artificial introduction of the endosymbiotic bacterium,

Indexed as

Aedes aegyptibiocontrolnutritional parasitismWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID33120915
PMCPMC7692218
OpenAlexW3096536832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.