ArticleMedicine2020
Danhong injection for the treatment of early diabetic nephropathy: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic nephropathy (DN) is the one that of the most common complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). Diabetic patients will experience a high mortality rate when DN progress to end-stage. So, it is extremely important to early treat DN. Although several interventions have been used to treat DN, a conclusive finding has not already been achieved. As one of the most common Chinese medicines, danhong injection (DHI) which has been shown to have various functions has also been prescribed to be as the alternative treatment option. However, no systematic review and meta-analysis has been conducted to objectively and comprehensively investigate its effectiveness and safety. Thus, we designed the current systematic review and meta-analysis to answer whether DHI can be preferably used to timely treat DN.
methodsWe will perform a systematic search to capture any potentially eligible studies in several electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, China National Knowledgement Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, and Chinese sci-tech periodical full-text database (VIP) from their inception to August 31, 2020. We will assign 2 independent reviewers to select eligible studies, and assess the quality of included studies with Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. We will perform all statistical analyses using RevMan 5.3 software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We will submit our findings to be taken into consideration for publication in a peer-reviewed academic journal. Meanwhile, we will also communicate our findings in important conferences. PROTOCOL REGISTRY: The protocol of this systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered at the International Plateform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY) platform (https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2020-9-0005/, registry number: INPLASY202090005) and this protocol was funded through a protocol registry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.